Resolution Supporting California�s Impact on the Democratic Presidential Nomination Process

California Young Democrats Logo

WHEREAS California’s impact in determining the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party for the last several elections has decreased, and

WHEREAS the current front-loaded primary system often results in fewer than 200,000 Iowans and 300,000 New Hampshire voters in the first weeks of January in effect choosing the Party’s nominee before being tested in larger states like California, and

WHEREAS California, as the highest populated state in the nation, deserves greater influence in determining the party’s nominee than simply serving as the fundraising capital for national candidates and their campaigns,

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the California Young Democrats (CYD) encourages presidential primary reform efforts that will:

· Allow a greater number of campaigns to begin at the grassroots level and build momentum;

· Provide a nominating process that remains competitive for a longer period of time in order to give the public a greater opportunity to engage the campaign and become informed about the candidates;

· And create a system that increases the likelihood that Democrats in all states will have an  effective voice in the selection of nominees, and

RESOLVED that CYD call on the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) Commission on Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling to seriously consider the California (or Graduated Random System) Plan which features a schedule consisting of 10 two-week intervals, during which randomly selected states will hold their primaries.  This 20-week schedule is the approximate length of the traditional presidential primary schedule, and

RESOLVED that CYD distribute copies of this resolution to all CYD chartered clubs, the California Democratic Party and the DNC for consideration and support.

Drafted by David Phelps, Past President, San Fernando Valley Young Democrats

 
June 16th 2004
Special Report- Democracy in America: Does Your Vote Matter
Business Week

June 1st 2004
Primary Campaigns
The Joyce Foundation

CVD conducts a survey in Illinois to determine the way people vote in primary elections.

April 7th 2004
Top-two primary is a horrible idea
North County Times

FairVote's Steven Hill discuss the shortcomings of California's new primary system.

March 23rd 2004
Kerry Needs Civil Rights Agenda
Chicago Sun-Times

March 15th 2004
Suffrage Suffers in the Land of Rights
Los Angeles Times

March 15th 2004
Democrats should lead on electoral reform
Working for Change

FairVote's Steven Hill and Rob Richie look at the flaws in the democratic primary process and the best methods to fix them.

March 2nd 2004
Primary Solutions
Baltimore Sun

The primary schedule manages to eliminate the majority of the population from elected a candidate and alienates voters at the same time.

January 1st 2001
Flunk the Electoral College, Pass Instant Runoffs
The Progressive

FairVote president John B. Anderson advocates national direct election of the U.S. president with IRV

July 22nd 2000
IRV for Primaries

FairVote member Janet Anderson writes a Letter to the Editor describing the advantages of using instant runoff voting to eliminate the need for messy primaries.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]