HJR 45
Background and Procedural Information

H.J.R. 45 was introduced on March 12, 2008 by Democrat Representative Simpson. One of the goals of the legislation is to modify congressional and legislative apportionment and districting.

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

Yes. Under the legislation, districts are to be divided into equally proportioned single-member districts.  

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

Yes. The legislation impliedly provides for Voting Rights Act compliance by stating that districts shall be compact, contiguous, not use voter history data, and shall comply with federal law.  

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The legislation is unclear on the formation of the redistricting commission, however, the commission consists of either eight electors or nine members, four of whom are selected by the state organizations of each of the two political parties whose candidates for governor received the highest vote at the last general election at which a governor was elected. The legislation also provides that two members shall be selected by the majority leader of the legislature, two members by the minority leader of the legislature, and the last member shall be selected by the other eight commissioners.  Additionally, the Secretary of State of Michigan shall serve as the secretary of the commission.
 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

Although not specifically provided for, the legislation states that districts may not favor a particular political party or incumbent legislator.  

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No, however, the commission may hold public hearings on the redistricting plans, and the public has at least 30-days in which it can comment on the plan prior to its adoption.  

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No. The legislation states that the federal decennial census must be used for reapportionment.

 
November 3rd 2002
Politics, Incumbency Style
Newsday

Columnist Rosanna Perotti discusses proportional representation as a solution to monopoly politics.

November 3rd 2002
Get your election results here: 99.8% accurate
Houston Chronicle

FairVote's Steven Hill and Rob Richie describe that the election results can be predicted in US, because most districts tilt strongly toward one party.

November 2nd 2002
Why state has few real races for House
San Jose Mercury News

FairVote's Larry Sabato comments on the lack of competitive House seats in the 2002 election, noting that San Jose residents have a better chance of affecting the race by donating money to a candidate in another part of the country than voting.

October 30th 2002
More than ever, incumbents in driver's seat
USA Today

Despite the fact redistricting is suppose to boost competition, this article explores how drawing congressional district lines has rendered 90% of elections nearly uncontested, drawing examples from Illinois.

October 28th 2002
GOP House members snug in incumbency
Cincinnati Enquirer

Money, incumbency advantage, and redistricting have transformed the American political system into a non-competitive arena.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]