SB 1352
Background and procedural information:
Democratic Senator Steven Geller introduced Senate Bill 1352 on 3/06/07, as a joint resolution proposing the repeal of section 16 of Article III of Florida’s constitution, relating to legislative apportionment and also creates a ballot issue to amend Florida’s constitution require a nine member commission to prepare an appointment plan for the state legislature and a redistricting plan for the congressional districts of the state.

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?
Single-member districts are required under the proposed legislation, and the districts will consist of 40 consecutively numbered senatorial districts and 120 consecutively numbered representative districts.  The single-member districts shall be as nearly equal in population as practicable.  

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (i.e. can the commission use voter history information)?
Yes, the proposed legislation provides for Voting Rights Act compliance, as it prevents the commission from drawing districts that would dilute the voting strength of a racial or language minority group.  This goal takes precedence over the requirements that districts be contiguous and compact in form.  

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?
A nine member commission will be formed, and no person or relative of a person who has served as an elected public official, party officer or Congressional employee within two years may be appointed as a member of the commission.

Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?
The proposed legislation implicitly favors, or rather assumes, competitive districts, by providing that a district may not be drawn for the purpose of favoring any political party, incumbent legislator, representative to U.S. Congress, nor take into account the addresses of incumbent legislators or representatives to the U.S. Congress.

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?
The legislation does not explicitly provide that members of the public have any input into the redistricting plans.

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?
No, the legislation does not allow for mid-decade redistricting.

 
March 31st 2005
A Good Proposal that Won't do Much
San Jose Mercury News

Newspaper endorses full representation and IRV to solve California's redistricting woes

February 19th 2005
Schwarzenegger vs. Gerrymander
New York Times

Steven Hill explains why Governor Schwarzenegger should consider full representation if he is serious about the need for more competitive elections

January 10th 2005
Recent elections drive redistricting reform:
California Aggie

Discussion of the issues leading to redistricting reform in California, and the potential benefits of a full representation system.

January 9th 2005
Consider alternate systems of voting
Sacramento Bee

How a commission to examine full representation systems in California elections would be a step beyond Governor Schwarzenegger's plans for redistricting reform.

January 1st 2005
Democracy at a Crossroads
The California Journal

Steven Hill writes an in-depth account of the various democracy reforms proposed and needed in California. He shows how a move to full representation would have a far greater impact on politics than the mooted redistricting reforms.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]