A Letter to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

August 31, 2006

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: AB 2948


Dear Gov. Schwarzenegger,

I am the executive director of FairVote. We are a non-partisan, non-profit organization that studies elections and advocates reforms based on the ideal that every American citizen deserves an equally meaningful and protected vote. Our chairman is former Member of Congress and presidential candidate John B. Anderson (R-IL). Our board includes Jones Day attorney Clay Mulford (manager of Ross Perot�s 1992 presidential campaign), Laura Liswood (founder of the Council of Women World Leaders and a Goldman Sachs executive), Hendrik Hertzberg (senior editor, New Yorker), Antonio Gonzalez (president of the William C. Vel�squez Institute) and former Washington Post columnist William Raspberry. Our California board members include Pete Martineau (active in two leading California seniors groups) and David Wilner (co-founder of Wind River Systems).

I am writing to express FairVote�s strong support for AB 2948, legislation pending your consideration that would have California enter into an interstate compact leading to a national popular election for the president. As you know, other states must follow California�s lead in joining this agreement before the plan can take effect. I expect to see identical bills introduced in all 50 states in the coming year: it is the right policy for our nation, for all states and for the principle of political equality in elections for our nation�s highest office.

California is the poster child for the inequities of the current Electoral College system: our nation�s most populous and renowned state has no direct role in general elections for president -- it would be as if Los Angeles County or Orange County could be completely ignored in California�s elections for governor. Fortunately, our Constitution provides state legislatures and governors with plenary power about how best to allocate their state�s electoral votes to serve the interests of their state and the nation. A national popular vote is the only reform alternative that establishes an absolutely level playing field without partisan bias. Although California cannot establish a national popular vote on its own, by approving AB 2948 it can show the leadership for which it is rightly famous. I believe that your decision to sign AB 2948 will send a strong message that you want California to matter in presidential elections. It is not right for any state to be ignored, but particularly one like California. I hope you will agree that every American�s vote should be equal, no matter where it is cast.


Sincerely yours,


Rob Richie
Executive Director
FairVote

 
March 14th 2002
Just because majority of voters hate you, it doesn't mean you can't win
Daily Herald

John Anderson is cited with his description of instant runoff voting (IRV), which would introduce majority voting and improve democracy.

August 20th 2001
Hard-won voting rights always in peril
San Francisco Examiner

We must break from the two-party system, institute proportional representation, implement instant runoff voting (IRV), and begin direct election of the President in order to truly level the playing field for minorities and women.

July 12th 2001
Preventing the next Florida fiasco
Daily Texan

The Daily Texan discusses the massive benefits brought by instant-runoff voting to an electoral system.

March 12th 2001
Reclaiming Democracy
The American Prospect

NYU law professor Burt Neuborne discusses a wide range of reforms, including calls for serious consideration of instant runoff voting and proportional voting methods

January 24th 2001
Meddling with Reform/A Clear Majority Winner in 2000
TomPaine.com

Rob Richie proposes instant runoff voting and proportional allocation of electoral votes at a time when national popular election of the president seems unlikely; John Anderson offers IRV as a remedy to the spoiler effect.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]