And The Last Shall Be First

The four elections in which the President-Elect lost the popular vote are: 

1824 – Adams over Jackson 

Popular vote margin: 44,804 - favoring Jackon

Electoral College margin: 15 - favoring Jackon


*John Q. Adams received fewer electoral votes and fewer popular votes than Andrew Jackson, but, as outlined by the Constitution, when no candidate receives the majority of the Electoral College vote the decision is turned over to the House of Representatives. There, 13 state delegations voted for John Q. Adams, 7 for Jackson and 3 for Crawford. (www.nara.gov)

1876 – Hayes over Tilden

Popular vote margin: 264,292 - favoring Tilden

Electoral College margin: 1 - electing Hayes


1888 – Harrison over Cleveland

Popular vote margin: 100,456 - favoring Cleveland

Electoral College margin: 65 - electing Harrison 


2000 – Bush over Gore

Popular vote margin: 543,895 (the largest so far) - favoring Gore

Electoral College margin: 5 - electing Bush


*Note: Some sources also consider 1960 a contested election. Although most believe Kennedy won the popular vote and the electoral college, some believe that there exists an alternative result that puts Nixon on top in popular votes. However, this election is not as harshly contested as the above four.

It is only luck that has saved us from more situations like these where the White House is not delivered to the President-Elect. Statistics show that close elections possess a very high possibility of this distorted result. Several elections throughout the 19th and 20th centuries have been so close that a small difference in votes – a fraction of 1 percent of the national vote – would have presented a different winner. 

Election Year Shift Needed In Which States
1828 11,517 Ohio, Kentucky, New York, Louisiana, Indiana
1840 8,386 New York, Pennsylvania, Maine, New Jersey
1844 2,555 New York
1848 3,227 Georgia, Maryland, Delaware
1864 38,111 New York, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Oregon, Wisconsin, Maryland, Connecticut
1868 29,862 Pennsylvania, Indiana, North Carolina, Alabama, Connecticut, California, Nevada
1880 10,517 New York
1884 575 New York
1892 37,364  New York, Indiana, Wisconsin, New Jersey, California
1896 20,296 Indiana, Kentucky, California, Delaware, Oregon, West Virginia
1900 74,755 Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, Maryland, Utah, Wyoming
1908 75,041 Ohio, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Delaware, West Virginia, Montana, Maryland
1916 1,983 California
1948 29,294 California, Ohio, Illinois
1960 11,424 Illinois, Missouri, New Mexico, Hawaii, Nevada
1976 9,246 Hawaii, Ohio

*Information from Why the Electoral College is Bad for America, George C. Edwards III


Ignoring Your Vote

More Options

Vague Values

Electoral Replacements

Electoral Tie

Favorite Son Effect

A Few States Wins

Constitutional Residence

State Size

Special Interests

Power of State Legislatures

 
Electoral College Table of Contents


 
August 22nd 2007
Stacking the Electoral Deck
The New York Times

The Gray Lady's editorial board comes out against schemes to allocate electoral votes by congressional districts, and reasserts support for the National Popular Vote plan.

August 22nd 2007
California Democrats push popular vote measure
Los Angeles Times

LA Times staff writer Dan Morain reports on the latest move towards NPV in California.

August 21st 2007
A critical reform in presidential elections
The Napa Valley Register

The author explains how the Electoral College allows a candidate to become president despite losing the nationwide popular vote. He argues that Congress has blocked past attempts to reform the system, but now National Popular Vote offers a way out.

August 20th 2007
In defense of 55 electoral votes
The San Francisco Chronicle

An editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle cites the bipartisan National Popular Vote effort, and its 364 sponsors in 47 states in contrast to the wrong-headed congressional district proposal being floated in California.

August 13th 2007
Will California alter '08 race?
Christian Science Monitor

The writer evaluates California Republicans' move to have the state's electoral votes awarded by district. He concludes that it is an unfair move that will benefit only Republicans, without correcting the flaws of the current system.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]