Maine and Nebraska
Maine and Nebraska both use an alternative method of distributing their electoral votes, called the Congressional District Method.  Currently, these two states are the only two in the union that diverge from the traditional winner-take-all method of electoral vote allocation.  

Since electors are awarded to each state based on the number of House seats plus the number of Senate seats (always two) the district method allocates one electoral vote to each congressional district.  The winner of each district is awarded one electoral vote, and the winner of the state-wide vote is then awarded the state’s remaining two electoral votes.  

This method has been used in Maine since 1972 and Nebraska since 1996, though since both states have adopted this modification, the statewide winners have consistently swept all of the state’s districts as well.  Consequently, neither state has ever split its electoral votes.

Although this method still fails to reach the full ideal of one-person one-vote, it has been proposed as a nationwide reform for the way in which electoral votes are distributed.


See our page on Reform Options for the Electoral College for more information.

Maine Senator John Martin, author of the state's congressional district plan in 1969, endorses the National Popular Vote plan.

Electoral College Table of Contents
        
    

 
December 21st 2004
Ohio
www.tompaine.com

The Bush electors in Ohio have cast their votes, even though the bitterly contested ballots that allegedly gave them standing as electors have not been recounted. When asked, the mainstream media will admit that there were rampant problems with this

December 13th 2004
County Chair Finds That Own Ballot Was Rejected
Channel 6 News New Orleans

November 21st 2004
America: restoring democracy
TomPaine.com

It's time to modernize and democratize our elections; several reforms our open to us.

November 2nd 2004
Abolish the Electoral College
The Harvard Crimson

November 2nd 2004
Putting fun back into elections
Decatur Daily

Opinion piece supporting IRV as a way to benefit third parties while ensuring majority rule.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]