|
Utah
House Districts: 3
Voting Age Population
2002:
1,587,000
2000:
1,465,000
1998:
1,432,000
1990:
1,095,406
Redistricting, 2001-2002
Monopoly (R) |
Presidential Vote
2000: Gore 26, Bush
67, Nader
5
1996: Clinton 33, Dole 54,
Perot
10
1992: Clinton 25, Bush 43,
Perot
27
U.S. House: 2
GOP, 1 Dem
Seat Changes
'02: 0
Facts in Focus:
Utah 1982 to
2002 |
| How
Utah Ranked in 2002 |
Democracy Index:
23rd
Margin of Victory: 6th
Landslide
Index: 13th |
Seats-to-Votes Distortion:
16th
Representation Index: 43rd
Voter Participation:
32nd |
| For
definitions of terms, please see this report's glossary page. |
|
 
|
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
| Democracy Index |
24.2 |
�� |
|
|
|
| Voter Turnout |
35.1% |
|
|
|
|
| Representation Index |
20.4% |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wasted Votes |
41.9% |
|
|
|
|
| % of Wasted R / D Votes |
33.9 / 50.0 |
|
|
|
|
| Drop-Off Voters |
-2.2% |
|
|
|
|
| Avg. Margin Of Victory |
18.6% |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Votes for (R�D�O%) |
58-40-2 |
|
|
|
|
| Seats for (R�D�O%) |
66.7-33.3-0 |
|
|
|
|
| Seat Changes |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| High % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
| Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1994 |
1996 |
1998 |
2000 |
| Democracy Index |
�� |
�� |
24.8 |
31.1 |
25.4 |
| Voter Turnout |
66% |
40% |
50% |
33% |
51.7% |
| Representation Index |
38.6% |
22.6% |
29.2% |
21.2% |
31.7% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wasted Votes |
42% |
44% |
42% |
35% |
38.7% |
| % of Wasted R / D Votes |
56 / 21 |
25 / 58 |
0 / 100 |
0 / 100 |
25.1 / 52.4 |
| Drop-Off Voters |
2.2% |
2.9% |
.3% |
4.9% |
1.5% |
| Avg. Margin Of Victory |
21% |
19% |
18% |
33% |
25.8% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Votes for (R�D�O%) |
49�46�5 |
50�43�7 |
58�40�2 |
65�27�9 |
56.2�40.1�3.5 |
| Seats for (R�D�O%) |
33�67�0 |
67�33�0 |
100�0�0 |
100�0�0 |
67�33�0 |
| Seat Changes |
�� |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| High % Turnout, District |
�� |
49 (2) |
62 (2) |
47 (2) |
72.5 (1) |
| Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
44 (3) |
58 (3) |
37 (3) |
66.7 (3) |
|
| Results 2002-2010 |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
| U.S. House
(R�D) |
2-1 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide
Index |
66.7% |
|
|
|
|
| Scale of Competitiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tight: <
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Competitive:
5-10 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Comfortable:
10-20 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide:
20-40 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
| No Contest:
40+ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Uncontested |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Incumbents |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Running
/ Total Seats |
2 / 3 |
|
|
|
|
| Re-Election /
Total Incumbent |
2 / 2 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide /
Total Incumbent |
1 / 2 |
|
|
|
|
| R. Landslide /
R. Incumbent |
1 / 1 |
|
|
|
|
| D. Landslide /
D. Incumbent |
0 / 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Untouchable
Repeat Landslide |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Uncontested
Primary |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Elected Women |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Elected Minorities |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
