|
Oklahoma
House Districts: 5
Voting Age Population 2002:
2,611,000 2000: 2,531,000
1998: 2,463,000
1990: 2,308,578
Redistricting, 2001-2002
Divided |
Presidential Vote 2000: Gore 38, Bush
60, Nader
0
1996: Clinton 41, Dole 48,
Perot
11
1992: Clinton 34, Bush 43,
Perot 23 U.S. House: 4 GOP,
1 Dem Seat Changes '02: 1 (-1R) Facts in Focus:
Oklahoma 1982 to
2002 |
| How
Oklahoma Ranked in 2002 |
Democracy Index:
25th
Margin of Victory: 15th Landslide
Index: 11th |
Seats-to-Votes Distortion:
36th
Representation Index: 30th Voter Participation:
22nd |
| For
definitions of terms, please see this report's glossary page. |
|

|
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
| Democracy Index |
24.4 |
�� |
|
|
|
| Voter Turnout |
38.4% |
|
|
|
|
| Representation Index |
24.6% |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wasted Votes |
35.9% |
|
|
|
|
| % of Wasted R / D Votes |
9.4 / 62.6 |
|
|
|
|
| Drop-Off Voters |
3.3% |
|
|
|
|
| Avg. Margin Of Victory |
29.7% |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Votes for (R�D�O%) |
55-39-6 |
|
|
|
|
| Seats for (R�D�O%) |
80-20-0 |
|
|
|
|
| Seat Changes |
1
(-1R) |
|
|
|
|
| High % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
| Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1994 |
1996 |
1998 |
2000 |
| Democracy Index |
�� |
�� |
26.8 |
30.8 |
34.7 |
| Voter Turnout |
55% |
40% |
49% |
35% |
42.9% |
| Representation Index |
34.3% |
26.3% |
29.9% |
21.9% |
28.7% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wasted Votes |
38% |
35% |
39% |
37% |
35% |
| % of Wasted R / D Votes |
52 / 28 |
7 / 69 |
0 / 100 |
0 / 100 |
11.6 / 68.1 |
| Drop-Off Voters |
8.2% |
2.6% |
2.2% |
1.7% |
11.8% |
| Avg. Margin Of Victory |
26% |
34% |
24% |
26% |
36.8% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Votes for (R�D�O%) |
40�60�1 |
57�38�5 |
61�37�2 |
63�37�1 |
64.5�30.9�4.4 |
| Seats for (R�D�O%) |
33�67�0 |
83�17�0 |
100�0�0 |
100�0�0 |
83�17�0 |
| Seat Changes |
�� |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| High % Turnout, District |
�� |
45 (5) |
55 (5) |
39 (5) |
51.5 (1) |
| Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
40 (6) |
46 (6) |
34 (6) |
41.5 (6) |
|
| Results 2002-2010 |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
| U.S. House
(R�D) |
4-1 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide
Index |
60.0% |
|
|
|
|
| Scale of Competitiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tight: <
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Competitive:
5-10 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Comfortable:
10-20 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide:
20-40 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| No Contest:
40+ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
| Uncontested |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Incumbents |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Running
/ Total Seats |
4 / 5 |
|
|
|
|
| Re-Election /
Total Incumbent |
4 / 4 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide /
Total Incumbent |
3 / 4 |
|
|
|
|
| R. Landslide /
R. Incumbent |
2 / 3 |
|
|
|
|
| D. Landslide /
D. Incumbent |
1 / 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Untouchable
Repeat Landslide |
2 |
|
|
|
|
| Uncontested
Primary |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Elected Women |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Elected Minorities |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|