New York
House Districts: 29
Voting Age Population 2002:
14,469,000 2000:
13,805,000
1998:
13,590,000
1990:
13,730,906
Redistricting, 2001-2002 Commission / VRA |
Presidential Vote 2000: Gore 60, Bush
35, Nader
4
1996: Clinton 59, Dole 31,
Perot
8
1992: Clinton 49, Bush 34,
Perot
16 U.S. House: 19 Dem 10
GOP Seat Changes '02: 1 (-1R inc def) Facts in Focus:
New York 1982 to
2002 |
How New
York Ranked in 2002 |
Democracy Index:
50th
Margin of Victory: 39th Landslide Index:
34th |
Seats-to-Votes Distortion: 25th
Representation Index: 48th
Voter Participation: 50th
|
For
definitions of terms, please see this report's glossary page. |
![](cols/ny.gif)
|
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
Democracy Index |
38.8 |
�� |
|
|
|
Voter Turnout |
26.4% |
|
|
|
|
Representation Index |
19.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasted Votes |
26.9% |
|
|
|
|
% of Wasted R / D Votes |
31.4 / 18.0 |
|
|
|
|
Drop-Off Voters |
12.8% |
|
|
|
|
Avg. Margin Of Victory |
47.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes for (R�D�O%) |
48-47-5 |
|
|
|
|
Seats for (R�D�O%) |
38-62-0 |
|
|
|
|
Seat Changes |
1 (-1R
inc def) |
|
|
|
|
High % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1994 |
1996 |
1998 |
2000 |
Democracy Index |
�� |
�� |
32.9 |
28.4 |
31 |
Voter Turnout |
43% |
34% |
41% |
31% |
42.1% |
Representation Index |
26.8% |
22.7% |
26.7% |
22% |
29.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasted Votes |
39% |
33% |
35% |
30% |
30.5% |
% of Wasted R / D Votes |
35 / 36 |
27 / 34 |
32 / 33 |
32 / 29 |
35.5 / 26.2 |
Drop-Off Voters |
14.5% |
11.4% |
12.1% |
9.9% |
14.6% |
Avg. Margin Of Victory |
34% |
45% |
40% |
48% |
46.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes for (R�D�O%) |
45�52�3 |
49�48�3 |
43�55�3 |
44�53�3 |
42.3�54.7�2.8 |
Seats for (R�D�O%) |
42�58�0 |
45�55�0 |
42�58�0 |
42�58�0 |
39�61�0 |
Seat Changes |
�� |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
High % Turnout, District |
�� |
49 (22) |
55 (27) |
44 (21,22) |
55.8 (22) |
Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
10 (12) |
18 (12) |
15 (12) |
21.9 (12) |
|
Results 2002-2010 |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
U.S. House
(R�D) |
10-19 |
|
|
|
|
Landslide
Index |
89.7% |
|
|
|
|
Scale of Competitiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
Tight: <
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Competitive:
5-10 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Comfortable:
10-20 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Landslide:
20-40 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
No Contest:
40+ |
22 |
|
|
|
|
Uncontested |
7 |
|
|
|
|
Incumbents |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Running
/ Total Seats |
29 / 29 |
|
|
|
|
Re-Election /
Total Incumbent |
28 / 29 |
|
|
|
|
Landslide /
Total Incumbent |
26 / 29 |
|
|
|
|
R. Landslide /
R. Incumbent |
10 / 11 |
|
|
|
|
D. Landslide /
D. Incumbent |
16 / 18 |
|
|
|
|
Untouchable
Repeat Landslide |
24 |
|
|
|
|
Uncontested
Primary |
25 |
|
|
|
|
Elected Women |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Elected Minorities |
4B 2 L |
|
|
|
|
|