|
New Hampshire
House Districts: 2
Voting Age Population
2002: 960,000
2000: 911,000
1998: 890,000
1990: 830,497
Redistricting, 2001-2002
Divided / VRA |
Presidential Vote
2000: Gore 47, Bush
48,
Nader 4
1996: Clinton 49, Dole 39,
Perot
10
1992: Clinton 39, Bush 38, Perot
23
U.S. House: 2
GOP
Seat Changes '02: 0
Facts in Focus:
New Hampshire 1982 to
2002 |
| How New
Hampshire Ranked in 2002 |
Democracy Index:
5th
Margin of Victory: 5th
Landslide
Index: 1st |
Seats-to-Votes Distortion: 47th
Representation Index: 20th
Voter Participation:
10th |
| For
definitions of terms, please see this report's glossary page. |
|
 
|
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
| Democracy Index |
18.6 |
�� |
|
|
|
| Voter Turnout |
46.2% |
|
|
|
|
| Representation Index |
26.5% |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wasted Votes |
42.5% |
|
|
|
|
| % of Wasted R / D Votes |
0% / 100% |
|
|
|
|
| Drop-Off Voters |
-0.1% |
|
|
|
|
| Avg. Margin Of Victory |
17.8% |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Votes for (R�D�O%) |
57-40-3 |
|
|
|
|
| Seats for (R�D�O%) |
100-0-0 |
|
|
|
|
| Seat Changes |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| High % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
| Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
| |
1992 |
1994 |
1996 |
1998 |
2000 |
| Democracy Index |
�� |
�� |
23.5 |
27.5 |
20.8 |
| Voter Turnout |
62% |
37% |
57% |
36% |
61% |
| Representation Index |
35.6% |
21.4% |
28.7% |
21.4% |
33.2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wasted Votes |
43% |
42% |
50% |
40% |
45.5% |
| % of Wasted R / D Votes |
40 / 41 |
0 / 100 |
0 / 100 |
0 / 100 |
0 / 100 |
| Drop-Off Voters |
.5% |
.8% |
1.6% |
.4% |
2% |
| Avg. Margin Of Victory |
19% |
21% |
5% |
21% |
11.6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Votes for (R�D�O%) |
44�52�4 |
58�38�4 |
50�45�5 |
60�39�1 |
54.4�42.9�2.6 |
| Seats for (R�D�O%) |
50�50�0 |
100�0�0 |
100�0�0 |
100�0�0 |
100�0�0 |
| Seat Changes |
�� |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| High % Turnout, District |
�� |
NA |
60 (1) |
39 (2) |
68.7 (1) |
| Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
NA |
59 (2) |
38 (1) |
65.3 (2) |
|
| Results 2002-2010 |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
| U.S. House
(R�D) |
2-0 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide
Index |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| Scale of Competitiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tight: <
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Competitive:
5-10 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Comfortable:
10-20 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide:
20-40 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| No Contest:
40+ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Uncontested |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Incumbents |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Running
/ Total Seats |
1 / 2 |
|
|
|
|
| Re-Election /
Total Incumbent |
1 / 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Landslide /
Total Incumbent |
0 / 1 |
|
|
|
|
| R. Landslide /
R. Incumbent |
0 / 1 |
|
|
|
|
| D. Landslide /
D. Incumbent |
NA |
|
|
|
|
| Untouchable
Repeat Landslide |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Uncontested
Primary |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Elected Women |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Elected Minorities |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
