Pledge your blue blood for a chance to vote
By JAYSON WHITEHEAD
Published May 1st 2007 in C-Ville Weekly
�A lot of it has to do with the dynamics and the mechanics of the vote casting,� says Meredith Richards. The two-time city councilor was ousted at the 2004 Nominating Convention, when she narrowly lost to a slate of three candidates, including Kendra Hamilton (who is not running again), Lynch (who is not running again, either) and Mayor David Brown (who is). Four were running and in a remarkable instance, all received more than 50 percent, as voters are allowed to cast as many as three selections. After the first vote, any candidate with less than 50 percent is dropped. In 2002, six candidates were going for two spots, and it took several rounds of voting before two received more than the required percentage.
�You could accomplish the same thing by just ordering the candidates in your order of preference,� Lynch says. He recently proposed an instant runoff system to the City Council that has yet to be approved. �1-2-3-4-5, and then it would just be one vote and you could do it on a laptop computer.�
Of course, Lynch�s system would potentially make the process much easier for the average voter who already must sit through a five-minute presentation by each candidate before casting a ballot. Otherwise, very little is required to vote. You simply must sign a form pledging your allegiance to the Democratic Party and vow to not work against the candidates selected. Despite the lack of requirements, only a relatively small percentage of the city�s voters show up. �Eight-thousand Democrats will show up for the general election,� says Lynch, �only about 500 will care about who specifically the candidate is.�
While the voting system is still in its infancy, the co-chair of the Charlottesville Democratic Party�s Executive Committee is pleased with its current operation. �This is a much more straightforward system,� says Sherry Kraft. �Those meetings in the past went on for hours and hours, and were less fair for a new candidate. This levels the playing field a little bit more.�
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.