Student Voting
Political apathy and subsequent low voter turnout of youth (18-29) is often cited as fact. Many decry their political disengagement and apparent laziness, but recent election cycles have presented a very different and much more troubling reason for why many youth do not vote.

Across the country, students reported that they were subjected to increased scrutiny, unequal treatment, and at times outright harassment when they attempted to register to vote or cast a ballot on Election Day. Such acts of voter intimidation and suppression are particularly distressing because most of the targeted individuals are registering to vote for the first time and are unfamiliar with election laws.

Despite the fact that every college student is entitled to register to vote at the residence he or she considers "home," including a campus residence, many college communities actively prevent college students from registering to vote where they attend school. Students around the country have faced difficulty registering to vote because of local officials. In the case of historically African-American Prairie View A&M in Texas, the District Attorney publicly stated that if students attempted to register to vote they would be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Common tactics used to dissuade students from registering to vote include:
  • Misinformation - telling college students they cannot register where they attend school or that if they register to vote at school they could be in jeopardy of losing financial aid, or that they are only able to vote where their parents pay taxes
  • Residency requirement legislation - The New Hampshire legislature passed a law after the 2000 presidential election that required newly registered voters to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver's license within 60 days or face criminal prosecution
Not only do students face challenges when trying to register to vote, but they also face challenges on Election Day.  In some instances, poll watchers have challenged students who are registered to vote by asking them to sign an affidavit affirming their citizenship and that they will only vote once. Long lines plagued many college campus polling places during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Although students are not traditionally considered a targeted demographic for voter suppression, it is clear that they, too, face many hurdles when attempting to register and vote.

 
Articles on Student Voting
November 21st 2000
Group Pushes Election 'Instant Runoff' Idea
Los Angeles Times

Public Interest Research Group, an organization founded by Ralph Nader, promotes the idea of instant runoff voting (IRV).

November 17th 2000
America's election confusion means it may be a 'Windows Millennium' after all
Infoworld.com

The United States needs to modernize its elections and the voting system because they invite suspicion of fraud.

November 17th 2000
INSTANT RUNOFFS WILL END 'LOSER-TAKES-ALL':
Lansing State Journal

Instant runoff voting (IRV) is the way to avoid expensive runoffs, spoiler problem and would promote positive campaigns.

November 16th 2000
Stand and be counted
Baltimore Sun

Presidential elections in 2000 were the great opportunity for Center and Democracy to take the message about instant runoff voting (IRS) to the general public.

November 16th 2000
Recent elections have made instant runoff voting look intriguing
Minneapolis Star-Tribune

This Star Tribune writer thinks the spoiler effect has become a much more serious problem since Alan Shilepsky made instant runoff voting (IRV) the center of his 1998 campaign and now advocates Minnesota take a closer look at the system.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]