Pro-IRV Letter to the Editor
Published June 16th 2004 in Seattle Times
The Times misses a golden opportunity to rectify the problem resulting from the court-mandated loss of Washington's beloved blanket primary. While most voters would prefer a substitute that would allow for more-open elections, Initiative 872 (creating the Top 2 system), promoted by the Washington Grange, is not it.

A far better solution available to voters: Initiative 318 (which) would adopt instant runoff voting (IRV).

I-872 limits voters in the general election to the top two primary finishers. What kind of a choice is that?

I-318, on the other hand, would allow voters to choose from the entire field of candidates in the general election and rank each one Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Green or whatever in order of preference in each race. It eliminates an unnecessary primary, thus saving approximately $13 million of taxpayer money each election cycle.

IRV has many other significant advantages: It eliminates the dreaded "spoiler" problem; no one need fear "wasting" his or her vote on a supposed unelectable candidate. The final winner would win by a majority, i.e., nothing less than 50 percent plus 1.

It would also stimulate voter turnout and induce more-positive campaigning.