6. In San Francisco, minority precincts
strongly voted in favor of Proposition A.
Proposition A was the March 5, 2002 ballot
measure that implemented ranked choice voting for all major city
offices. According to
an analysis by Professor Rich DeLeon of San Francisco State
University, Proposition
A was strongly supported in the most minority precincts in
the city, and by all racial/ethnic groups except conservative white
voters:
Voters
in
Yes on Prop A %
Latino
precincts
69% (40% VAP) African
American
62% precincts (>40%
VAP) Asian American
55% precincts (>50% VAP) Citywide total
55% White
liberal pcts
66% White conservative
pcts 42%
7. Ranked choice voting has been strongly
supported by minority leaders and organizations.
In San Francisco, minority backers of Proposition
A to adopt ranked-choice voting (2002) and/or Proposition H to adopt
the at-large version of ranked-choice voting (1996) included the
Latino Democratic Club, Chinese for Affirmative Action, Asian
Pacific Democratic Club, Asian Week, San Francisco Bayview
Newspaper, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund
(MALDEF), President of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors Matt
Gonzalez, school board members Eric Mar and Mark Sanchez, and
more. Other endorsers
of Proposition A included current Secretary of State Kevin Shelley,
former Secretary of State (acting) Tony Miller, San Francisco
Democratic Party, San Francisco Planning and Urban Research
Association (SPUR), San Francisco Labor Council, Services Employees
International Union Locals 790 and 250, Common Cause, California
PIRG, Congress of California Seniors, Sierra Club, Senior Action
Network, League of Conservation Voters, NOW, Harvey Milk L/G/B/T
Democratic Club, California Nurses Association, SF Tenants Union,
and more.
Outside of San Francisco, ranked-choice systems
have drawn support from a wide range of organizations and
individuals. A partial list includes the League of Women Voters of
California, Democracy
South, Southwest Voter, United Farm Workers, US PIRG, Common Cause,
National Organization for Women, and individuals such as Congressman
Jesse Jackson Jr. (Illinois), Congressman James Clyburn (South
Carolina, former head of the Congressional Black Caucus), Rev. Jesse
Jackson, Sr., former Congressman Tom Campbell, Lani Guinier, Dolores
Huerta, former Vermont governor Howard Dean, Senator John McCain,
the editorial boards of USA Today, Minneapolis Star Tribune and St.
Petersburg Times, and many more.
8. No evidence of
negative impact on minorities in over 100 years of research.
Political
scientists long have documented the ability of all sorts of voters
to use ranked ballot voting systems. Dr. Shaun Bowler, a
political science professor who specializes in voting methods at the
University of California-Riverside, has said, "The idea that
minority voters can't rank candidates is flat wrong. There's a hundred years of
evidence from around the world that voters of many cultures,
languages, literacy levels, and educational attainments can rank
candidates."
Dr. Benjamin Reilly, a research fellow at the
Australian National University and an international expert on the use of ranked
choice voting, wrote, "There is ample evidence that
assuming basic voter education is forthcoming, voters fairly quickly
understand the logic, if not the mechanics, of preferential voting.
Examination of election results in both pre-independence Papua New
Guinea and outback Australian aboriginal communities, for example,
has found that the concept of rank-ordering potential
representatives is intelligible to voters, and that they have little
difficulty marking their ballots, particularly following several
electoral iterations. As one aboriginal educator in Australia's
Northern Territory put it, even at his remote settlement "voters
���Ǩ��clearly knew how to mark ���Ǩ��1' for the good bloke, ���Ǩ��2' for the okay
bloke and ���Ǩ��3' for the bad bloke.'"
Non-English
speakers in Australia, London, New York City, Cambridge, MA and
elsewhere have been able to rank their ballots for their
elections.
Ireland adopted ranked-choice voting eighty years ago
after it gained independence, and had a 1% voter error rate in its
first election despite relatively low rates of literacy.
There simply is no evidence that ranked ballots have been a barrier
to electoral success for racial or language minorities in these
elections -- quite the contrary.
Conclusion
In sum, while the amount of data, especially in
the United States, is not great, there is strong evidence from both
the United States and abroad that ranked ballots and ranked choice
voting have been advantageous to communities of color and their
candidates. There is no evidence of a negative impact on racial or
language minorities resulting from ranked choice voting or the type
of ranked ballots used in such elections. And there also is no
evidence that ranked ballots have been confusing for minority
voters.
At the same time, there is plenty of evidence of
the discriminatory impacts and voting rights implications in the use
of San Francisco's previous two-round (December) runoff system.
Finally, San Francisco's communities of color
strongly supported Proposition A to implement ranked choice
voting. |