Press Release
New election reform wave
hits college campuses UC-Davis joins student governments adopting
fair elections methods April 1, 2003 Contact: John
Russell, 301-270-4616
In a vote that
reflects a growing national trend toward better voting methods, the
Associated Students of UC-San Diego (ASUCSD) have approved instant
runoff voting for student government elections. ASUCSD members voted
overwhelmingly for the measure after a Voting Systems Task Force
unanimously selected instant runoff voting over nine other
systems.
Recommended by
Roberts Rules of Order, IRV simulates a majority runoff
election, but in a single election. As with traditional ���delayed���
runoffs, a candidate wins if receiving a majority (more than 50%) of
the vote. But instead
of holding two separate elections, voters vote for both their first
choice and for their runoff choices by ranking candidates: first
choice, second and third. If no candidate receives 50% of first
choices, the instant runoff takes place. The weak candidates are
eliminated, and ballots are counted for the top-ranked candidate on
each ballot in the runoff. The system ensures a majority of students
support the winning candidate, without the cost, negative
campaigning and drop in turnout often associated with delayed runoff
elections.
Many colleges
such as Caltech, MIT, Rice, Harvard and Princeton have used IRV for
years, but now the number is growing rapidly. Schools recently
adopting IRV include Duke, Vassar, University of California ��� Davis,
University of Maryland, University of Illinois, Whitman and William
and Mary. This November, San Francisco will become the first major
U.S. city to use IRV for citywide elections. IRV legislation has
been introduced this year in 20 states.
The Voting
System Task Force analyzed 10 different voting methods and then
conducted mock elections with their top four choices to gauge
student reaction. ���The Voting System Task Force decided that IRV was
the best option available,��� said Max Harrington, UCSD freshman
senator and task force chair. ���The AS heeded our call, and I���m proud
to say that UCSD has now joined in a growing movement which is
seeking to re-democratize our country,���
A main benefit
of IRV cited by the task force was its positive effect on voter
turnout. ���In our surveys students reported that they felt better
represented by IRV than by plurality and some students who haven���t
voted in past elections even said they would vote in future
elections if IRV were implemented,��� said Georgia Kellogg, an
At-large member of the task force.
To ensure
representative leaders, many student governments as well as local
and state jurisdictions around the country have a majority rule
requirement for elections that often leads to runoff elections when
one candidate does not garner 50% of the votes. At the student
government level these runoffs can result in decreased turnout and
increased costs. The administration of a campus-wide election can
cost several thousand dollars.
���I
think that instant runoff voting is the financially responsible
choice since it corrects the problems of runoffs in one system,
promotes maximized voter choice and better ensures majority rule,���
said UCSD freshman senator Mike Schoeck.
|