Democratic performance was flat in House districts that have become
all-Republican -- Democrats held four of six seats just four years ago despite Bill
Clinton's poor performance, a change that demonstrates well the
"nationalization" of voting patterns in House races. Only one seat should be
very competitive in 1998.
click here to go to key to explain symbols
PREDICTION: Landslide Win (3: 3R) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
{1. Steve Largent (R)}* | 68% | 63% | - | 37% (-12, up 1) | 1994 |
{5. Ernest Istook (R)}* | 70% | 78% | 53% | 31% (-18, 0) | 1992 |
6. Frank Lucas (R)* | 64% | 69% | - | 41% (-8, up 1) | 1994 |
PREDICTION: Comfortable Win (2: 2R) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
2. Tom Coburn (R)* | 55% | 52% | - | 47% (-2, down 2) | 1994 |
{4. J. C. Watts (R)}* | 58% | 52% | - | 40% (-9, up 1) | 1994 |
PREDICTION: Vulnerable (1: 1R) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
3. Wes Watkins (R) | 51% | - | - | 47% (-2, down 1) | 1996 |
click here to go to key to explain symbols
back to Summary page