California's entrenched incumbents had a very good year in 1996. All "untouchables" repeated their landslide wins. Nearly all represent districts that strongly match their party: of the 35 representatives predicted to win landslides in 1998, 32 represent districts where Clinton received at least 8% higher or lower than his average. Incumbent performance in these districts was very consistent in 1992-1996 despite national changes in House elections. The elections are progressively more competitive in districts where Clinton ran closer to his national average. Of the ten most competitive districts, seven are held by Democrats.
click here to go to key to explain symbols
PREDICTION: Uncontested Win (9: 5R, 4D) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
18. Gary Condit (D)* | 66% | 66% | 85% (U) | 46% (-3, down 1) | 1988 |
{19. George Radanovich (R)}* | 67% | 57% | - | 40% (-9, down 4) | 1994 |
{21. Bill Thomas (R)}* | 66% | 68% | 65% | 34% (-15, down 4) | 1978 |
25. Buck McKeon (R)* | 62% | 65% | 52% | 41% (-8, down 1) | 1992 |
26. Howard Berman (D)* | 66% | 63% | 61% | 65% (+16, up 2) | 1982 |
35. Maxine Waters (D)* | 86% | 78% | 83% | 84% (+35, 0) | 1990 |
{48. Ron Packard (R)}* | 66% | 73% | 61% | 34% (-15, down 1) | 1982 |
50. Bob Filner (D)* | 62% | 57% | 57% | 60% (+11, up 5) | 1992 |
52. Duncan Hunter (R)* | 65% | 64% | 53% | 41% (-8, up 1) | 1980 |
PREDICTION: Landslide Win (25: 9R, 16D) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
{2. Wally Herger (R)}* | 61% | 64% | 65% | 36% (-13, down 6) | 1986 |
{4. John Doolittle (R)}* | 61% | 61% | 50% | 38% (-11, down 2) | 1990 |
5. Robert Matsui (D)* | 70% | 68% | 69% | 57% (+8, 0) | 1978 |
6. Lynn Woolsley (D)* | 62% | 58% | 65% | 57% (+8, down 5) | 1992 |
7. George Miller (D)* | 72% | 70% | 70% | 65% (+16 down 2) | 1974 |
8. Nancy Pelosi (D)* | 84% | 82% | 83% | 74% (+25, down 8) | 1986 |
9. Barbara Lee (D) | 1998: 71% (Special Election) |
75% (+26, down 10) | 1998 | ||
12. Tom Lantos (D)* | 72% | 67% | 69% | 64% (+15, up 1) | 1980 |
13. Pete Stark (D)* | 65% | 65% | 60% | 62% (+13, up 2) | 1972 |
14. Anna Eshoo (D)* | 65% | 61% | 57% | 58% (+9, down 2) | 1992 |
16. Zoe Lofgren (D)* | 66% | 65% | - | 61% (+12, up 3) | 1994 |
23. Elton Gallegly (R)* | 60% | 66% | 54% | 45% (-4, up 1) | 1986 |
28. David Dreier (R)* | 61% | 67% | 58% | 45% (-4, up 1) | 1980 |
29. Henry Waxman (D)* | 68% | 68% | 61% | 66% (+17, down 6) | 1974 |
30. Xavier Becerra (D)* | 72% | 66% | 58% | 71% (+22, up 2) | 1992 |
31. Matthew Martinez (D)* | 67% | 59% | 63% | 65% (+16, up 7) | 1982 |
32. Julian Dixon (D)* | 82% | 78% | 87% | 81% (+32, down 3) | 1978 |
33. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D)* | 82% | 81% | 63% | 80% (+31, up 11) | 1992 |
34. Open [Torres (D)] | [68%] | [62%] | [61%] | 64% (+15, up 7) | 1982 |
37. Juanita Mill.-McDon. (D)* | 85% | 78% (special election) | - | 81% (+32, up 1) | 1995 |
{39. Ed Royce (R)}* | 63% | 66% | 57% | 41% (-8, up 1) | 1992 |
{40. Jerry Lewis (R)}* | 65% | 71% | 63% | 38% (-11, down 3) | 1978 |
{45. Dana Rohrabacher (R)}* | 61% | 69% | 55% | 38% (-11, 0) | 1988 |
{47. Christopher Cox (R)}* | 66% | 72% | 65% | 36% (-13, down 1) | 1988 |
{51. Duke Cunningham (R)}* | 65% | 67% | 56% | 38% (-11, 0) | 1990 |
PREDICTION: Comfortable Win (6: 4R, 2D) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
11. Richard Pombo (R)* | 59% (L) | 62% | 48% | 46% (-3, down 1) | 1992 |
15. Tom Campbell (R)* | 59% (L) | 59% (special election) | - | 53% (+4, up 1) | 1996 |
17. Sam Farr (D)* | 59% (L) | 52% | - | 55% (+6, down 4) | 1993 |
20. Calvin Dooley (D)* | 57% | 57% | 65% | 52% (+3, down 1) | 1990 |
41. Open [Kim (R)]* | [58%, L] | [62%] | [60%] | 43% (-6, up 2) | 1992 |
43. Ken Calvert (R)* | 55% | 55% | 47% | 43% (-6, down 1) | 1992 |
PREDICTION: Win (2: 2R) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
44. Mary Bono (R)* | 1998: 57% (special election) | 44% (-5, down 3) | 1994 | ||
49. Brian Bilbray (R)* | 53% (C) | 49% | - | 49% (0, 0) | 1994 |
PREDICTION: Vulnerable (9: 3R, 6D) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
1. Frank Riggs (R)* | 50% | 53% | - | 48% (-1, down 5) | 1994 |
10. Ellen Tauscher (D) | 49% | - | - | 48% (-1, 0) | 1996 |
22. Open [Walter Capps (D)] | [48%] | - | - | 44% (-5, down 3) | [1996] |
24. Brad Sherman (D) | 49% | - | - | 52% (+3, down 2) | 1996 |
27. James Rogan (R) | 50% | - | - | 49% (0, down 1) | 1996 |
36. Open [Harman (D)] | [53%] | [48%] | 48% | 47% (-2, 0) | [1992] |
38. Steve Horn (R)* | 53% | 58% | 49% | 53% (+4, up 2) | 1992 |
42. George Brown (D)* | 50% | 51% | 51% | 53% (+4, up 1) | 1972 |
46. Loretta Sanchez (D) | 47% | - | - | 49% (0, up 6) | 1996 |
PREDICTION: Underdog (1: 1D) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996: | 1994: | 1992: | Clinton: | First: | |
3. Open [Vic Fazio (D)] | [54% (C)] | [50%] | [51%] | 45% (-4, down 2) | [1978] |
click here to go to key to explain symbols
back to Summary page