October 23rd 2004
Reform idea: Run-off elections might be an improvement
Corvallis Gazette-Times (OR)

Editorial promotes IRV to counter spoiler problem

October 21st 2004
Votes would carry more weight with instant runoff
Detroit Free Press

Editorial support for IRV in Ferndale.

October 21st 2004
Votes would carry more weight with instant runoff
Detroit Free Press

By voting Yes on Proposal B, Ferndale voters would introduce instant-runoff voting into the city's elections.

October 14th 2004
Kansas could gain from election reform
The Wichita Eagle

Changing the electoral system to full representation would improve our democracy.

September 22nd 2004
Spoiler Nader b-a-a-c-k
Bradenton Herald (FL)

Newspaper urges lawmakers to get to the heart of the spoiler problem

September 8th 2004
A better way to settle primaries
Star News Online

August 16th 2004
Second Place Can Win
Bangor Daily News

Newspaper argues for IRV, against spoiler problem

August 15th 2004
Our View: Primary runoff system needed
The Steamboat Pilot

July 24th 2004
Detergent for Political Dirty Tricks
Portland Oregonian

May 16th 2004
An instant improvement
Provo Daily Herald

An editorial that praises IRV as a system that will represent individual voters opinions better

March 11th 2004
Instant Runoff Voting: Let Roseville Voters Try it
Star Tribune (MN)

A five-candidate special election prompts call for IRV

March 10th 2004
IRV is as easy as 1, 2, 3
pulsetc.com

Instant runoff voting is both simply and effective, it allows voters to make the best decision without confusing them in any way, Minneapolis should use instant runoff voting in future elections.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]