|

|
Montanaís Political Lineup
|
1991 |
2001 |
Governor |
R |
R |
State
Senate |
29D,
21R |
31R,
19D |
State
House |
61D, 39R |
58R,
42D |
US
Senators |
1D,
1R |
1D,
1R |
US
Reps |
1D,
1R |
1R | |
Redistricting
Deadline
The congressional deadline is
within a 90 day period after the final decennial census figures are
available. However, since the state has one congressional district
no
changes will be made.
For state legislative districting, the plan must be submitted to the legislature
at the first regular session after the Districting and
Apportionment commission has been appointed or census data is available. The
legislature then has 30 days to submit recommendations,
and the commission has 30 more days to file the plan. The
plan must be filed by the 10th day of the 2003
session. |
Whoís in Charge of
Redistricting?
The five-member Districting and
Apportionment Commission is in charge of both congressional (when
Montana had two districts, which it may again in 2002) and state legislative
redistricting. Leaders of the four caucuses in both houses each
choose a civilian member. The existing four members of the
commission choose a fifth member who serves as chair. The governor
has no veto power over any redistricting plan.
|
Districting Principles
Principle |
Congressional |
State
Legis. |
Compactness |
|
+ |
Contiguity |
|
+ |
Political sub. |
|
+ |
Communities |
|
+ |
District cores |
|
|
Incumbents |
|
-- |
VRA ß 5 |
|
| +
= required
-- = prohibited
a = allowed |
Public Access
Between eight and twelve mandatory public
hearings
are held statewide and 10 commission
meetings are usually held. The commission has set up a website.
|
Political Landscape
The process has been less partisan than in many
states. District lines are actually drawn by nonpartisan
researchers with guidance from the commission. The only anticipated concern
is protecting the seven large Indian reservations in the state from
minority vote dilution. Montana lost a district after the 1990 census and
now elects its representative at-large.
The state has swung strongly to
Republicans in the state legislature in the last decade. There is
only one U.S. House
district despite the fact that the state's population likely will
top one million by 2010.
|
Legal Issues
After the 1990 census, Montana
lost one of its two congressional seats after reapportionment of the
U.S. House of Representatives. The state of Montana sued the U.S.
Department of Commerce claiming that the census bureau's method of
assigning seats (the method of equal proportions) did not achieve
the greatest possible equality in the number of persons per
representative. In rejecting Montana's claim, the U.S. Supreme Court
pointed out that this method of reapportionment has been used since
the 1920 census and does achieve the smallest relative difference
between the populations per representative of districts among the
states.
Montana's legislative district plan was challenged by
a group of Native Americans claiming minority vote dilution under
section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The court dismissed the claim
and noted the plaintiff's failure to show racial bloc-voting by
white voters in the affected areas. |
Irregularly Shaped
District None (there is only one at-large House
seat) |
Contact Information
John MacMaster Staff Attorney Legislative Services Division
P.O. Box 201706 Helena, MT 59620-1706 406/444-3064
406/444-3036 Fax [email protected]
Susan Fox Researcher Legislative Services
Division P.O. Box 201706 Helena, MT 59620-1706
406/444-3064 406/444-3036 Fax [email protected] |
For more information:
National Committee for an Effective Congress' Redistricting
Resource: Montana -Overview
EMILY's List Congressional Redistricting Report: Montana -Overview
Glossary
Redistricting
Provisions 2000
|