Return to CVD homepage
Search the CVD website Make a tax-deductible contribution to CVD We welcome your feedback
Return to CVD homepage
What's new?
Online library
Order materials
Get involved!
Links related to electoral reform
About CVD


Excerpts From:

Thirty Years of Gerrymandering 
in the Buckeye State

By David L. Horn


David L. Horn is director of the Center for Research into Government Processes, Inc., a non-profit organization in New Marshfield, Ohio. He has closely followed redistricting in Ohio for decades and was a central figure in developing and popularizing the Ohio Anti-Gerrymandering Amendment. Versions of this amendment have been introduced -- with bi-partisan support-- in the state legislature since the 1980s and been the subject of several hearings. Amendment backers seek to remove discretion from the redistricting process by establishing clear, objectively-measurable criteria to govern how district lines are drawn. Although most nations with single-member districts indeed typically have such criteria-driven processes, the Anti-Gerrymandering Amendment would be unique in being driven entirely by criteria -- with no subjective interpretation permitted.

In 1999, the League of Women Voters of Ohio led an initiative drive to put the Anti-Gerrymandering Amendment on the ballot in order to reform the 2001-2002 redistricting process. The Ohio AFL-CIO supported the measure and at one point publicly announced it would seek to help put it on the November 2000 ballot. The Republican-controlled legislature and Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell made moves to place a competing measure on the ballot which would institute the anti-gerrymandering amendment process in 2011 rather than 2001. Ultimately, neither effort was successful in gaining a spot on the ballot.

Horn demonstrates his vast knowledge of redistricting in Ohio with a slide show that he has presented to many groups in Ohio. Following are highlights of the slide series that detail some of the real examples of how partisan results are manipulated and certain legislators are protected or targeted in redistricting. The entire series is available for download; the series in its entirety provides more concrete examples of how redistricting has worked in Ohio over the past four decades and more details on how the criteria-driven process would work.


To begin view the excerpts click here to Begin (use the buttons in the upper-left corner to navigate within the series)

Or for specific pages:

Slide  Title


1 Introduction

A short history and description of Gerrymandering.

2 Calabrese's Lobe A story of a state senator who sought to draw his distirct lines to encompass a large portion of the Cleveland area's Italian-American population.
3 Spread Out A story about an Ohio House District that radically changed in nature.
4 Throw-Away District The classic description of a party packing a large portion of its opposition's voters into one district.


House Dist. 66 This slide shows a similarity to a throw-away district, except it was house members being packed together.


Buckeye Village A vignette about Columbus and its political divisions.


The "Banana" A district expanded in physical size results in two more Republicans pitted against each other. 

The entire series is available for download in pdf format.  Download the zip file and then extract the pdf files to a directory.  You can then view the individual slides of the series using adobe acrobat. 

5 sequences (pdf files that show the order viewing once you have downloaded all of the files): The sequence descriptions include a Full version, a North Eastern Ohio version, a North Western Ohio version, a South Eastern Ohio version and a South Western Ohio version.

Files 1-8
Files 9-20
Files 21-30
Files 31-38
Files 39-48
Files 49-55
Files 55x-64


Return to top of page

Copyright 2003     The Center for Voting and Democracy
6930 Carroll Ave, Suite 610, Takoma Park, MD 20912
(301) 270-4616