CVD homepage
What's new?
Online library
Order materials
Get involved!
Links
About CVD

Detroit Free Press

New election, same old 2000 problems

By Robert Richie and Steven Hill

October 29, 2004

The 2000 presidential election was a slap in the face for a complacent
nation. The utter failure of the fundamentals of our elections should have
been a clarion call for change. Yet here we are in 2004, teetering on the
precipice of an election that threatens to repeat nearly every flaw of four
years ago.


All signs suggest a tightly fought election. And given our failure to
modernize elections, from voting equipment to voting systems, the presidency is far too likely to be decided by a judge than by voters and go to the candidate with fewer popular votes.


Let's review major defects exposed by the 2000 presidential election, how we failed to correct them and what we must do to be as proud of our elections as our military hardware.


-The candidate with the most votes didn't win: The Electoral College is an 18th-century anachronism. It doesn't guarantee even a plurality winner, and this year led to most Americans being completely ignored in the presidential race because they did not live in a battleground state. It also invites electoral fraud; those inclined to steal an election can target their efforts on a few battleground states.


As recently as 1969 the U.S. House overwhelmingly voted for an amendment to abolish the Electoral College, but this term there was not one piece of legislation even mentioning the phrase until a few weeks ago. Whether or not we again get a wrong-way winner, it's time to embrace Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.'s resolution for direct election of the president by majority vote.


-We couldn't count the ballots right: Who can forget the hanging chads,
butterfly ballots, long lines and voter registration snafus of the 2000
election? Congress for one. It passed the Help America Vote Act in 2002, but stopped at that halting first step.


The act accepts the chaos and disenfranchisement that flows from our
decentralized election administration, where more than 13,000 jurisdictions across the nation run elections with little uniformity and not enough money.


The news is full of state and local decisions that will disenfranchise
voters this fall. Florida and Ohio plan to toss out all provisional ballots
cast by registered voters who were not informed they were in the wrong
polling place. A Nevada judge rejected a lawsuit asking the state to reopen voter registration for citizens whose registrations were torn up by a partisan voter registration firm.


Most voters in Ohio will use the thoroughly discredited punch card system, while Florida voters will largely vote on new "touch screen" systems developed by private companies with proprietary software that is poorly tested and regulated and lacks a voter verifiable paper trail.


Against all international norms, states collectively have stripped nearly 5
million American citizens, disproportionately minority, from election rolls.
And states have failed to register nearly one out of every three American
adults.


The expected chaos and confusion has made work for swarms of lawyers ready to pounce on flaws. Once again state and federal judges could effectively pick the winner. To keep the decision in the hands of voters, we need to pass  legislation for a clear constitutional right to vote and build a coherent, transparent electoral infrastructure with uniform standards and secure voting equipment and software developed for the public interest.


-Our system breaks down with more than two choices:  In 2000, the combined vote for Al Gore and Ralph Nader was more than 51 percent of the national total and more than 50 percent of the vote in Florida. But because it was divided between two candidates, George Bush won Florida and the presidency.


Third-party candidates like David Cobb, Michael Badnarik and Ralph Nader add to the debate of important issues ignored by poll-driven campaigns, but also threaten to spoil the race for one candidate. States could have accommodated more choice and ensured a majority winner by passing statutes to adopt instant runoff voting. A few far-sighted political leaders like Howard Dean and John McCain back IRV, and now San Francisco's breakthrough IRV elections this fall could spur a wave of reform.


Action on these three areas would bring presidential elections up to
21st-century standards. But that's just the beginning. From universal voter registration to fair candidate access to our public airwaves to full
representation electoral methods for electing our legislatures, providing
full access, competitive choice and fair representation to all voters must
be the nation's business.


In the wake of a potential ugly sequel to Election 2000, let's push for real
change.


top of page


______________________________________________________________________
Copyright 2002     The Center for Voting and Democracy
6930 Carroll Ave. Suite 610, Takoma Park MD 20912
(301) 270-4616      info@fairvote.org