HJR 14
Background and Procedural Information

Republican State Representative Daniel R. Foley introduced H.J.R. 14 on February 8, 2008.  The legislation establishes an independent redistricting commission to determine congressional, public regulation commission and state legislative district boundaries following each federal decennial census or as otherwise required.  

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

Yes. The legislation provides that members of the state legislature be elected from single-member districts.  

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

Partially. Section 2, Subsection I of the legislation excludes party registration and voting history data from being used during the initial phase of the mapping process, but permits such data to be used to test maps for compliance with the criteria provided in Subsection H of the legislation.
Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The independent redistricting commission consists of 5 members, no more than 2 of which are members of the same political party and no more than 2 of which shall reside in the same county. Each member must be a registered qualified elector of New Mexico who has been continuously registered with the same political party or registered as unaffiliated with a political party for 3 or more years immediately preceding appointment.  The commission is formed by New Mexico appellate judges who create a list of 25 individuals that are qualified to serve on the independent redistricting commission.  There must be 10 nominees from each of the 2 largest political parties in New Mexico based on party registration, and 5 nominees who are not registered with either of the 2 largest political parties in New Mexico.  From the list of nominees, the president pro tempore of the senate shall appoint 1 member, the speaker of the house of representatives shall appoint 1 member, and the house and senate floor leaders of the minority party shall appoint 1 member each.  Those 4 individuals then select a fifth member who is not registered with any party already represented on the commission to serve as chairman.

 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

Section 2, Subsection H explicitly states that “competitive districts shall be favored where to do so would create no significant detriment to the other criteria.”

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No. However, the legislation does require that the commission’s proposed plan be advertised for public comment for at least 30 days.  

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No.  
 
   
March 31st 2005
A Good Proposal that Won't do Much
San Jose Mercury News

Newspaper endorses full representation and IRV to solve California's redistricting woes

February 19th 2005
Schwarzenegger vs. Gerrymander
New York Times

Steven Hill explains why Governor Schwarzenegger should consider full representation if he is serious about the need for more competitive elections

January 10th 2005
Recent elections drive redistricting reform:
California Aggie

Discussion of the issues leading to redistricting reform in California, and the potential benefits of a full representation system.

January 9th 2005
Consider alternate systems of voting
Sacramento Bee

How a commission to examine full representation systems in California elections would be a step beyond Governor Schwarzenegger's plans for redistricting reform.

January 1st 2005
Democracy at a Crossroads
The California Journal

Steven Hill writes an in-depth account of the various democracy reforms proposed and needed in California. He shows how a move to full representation would have a far greater impact on politics than the mooted redistricting reforms.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]