HB 836
Background and Procedural Information

On January 8, 2008 Virginia Democratic House Delegate Brian Moran introduced Virginia House Bill 836 (VA H.B. 836).  As of June 6, 2008 it was left in the Committee on Privileges and Elections.  This bill would create a five-member independent redistricting committee composed of retired judges who would be responsible for creating redistricting plans for the Virginia legislative and congressional districts.   

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

No.  Single-member districts are neither required nor implied.  

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

Yes.  VA H.B. 836 states, “All districts shall be drawn to comply with the Virginia and United States Constitutions, federal law, the federal Voting Rights Act as amended, and relevant case law.” The commission may not use data regarding election outcomes, voting history, voting trends or patterns, the residences of candidates for relevant offices, or the partisan affiliation of voters except to test for legal compliance.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court nominates twenty-four Virginia state and federal judges who have never held a partisan office.  The Speaker of the House of Delegates, the Minority Leader of the House of Delegates, the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate each select one of the nominees to serve as commissioners.  These four commissioners then select one of the remaining twenty nominees to serve as the chairman and final member of the commission.  The Commission will submit a plan to the legislature.  The legislature will make the final decision although the commission may comment on the proposed amendments or changes to the final district maps.
 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

Yes.  Competitive districts are considered one of the eight standards that the commission is instructed to use in creating the district maps.  However, competitive districts may not “be made artificially competitive in violation of other standards.”

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No.  Members of the public may attend and give comments at a minimum of five public hearings.  There is also a twelve-member citizens advisory board whose members may give advice to the commission at the commission’s request.  The same four legislative leaders who appointed the first four commissioners each appoint three members to serve on the advisory board.    

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No.  The Commission is dissolved after it presents its maps in years ending in one.

 
July 21st 2005
Reformers back bill on redistricting
Roll Call

Tanner's Redistricting bill gains support, slowly but surely.

May 30th 2005
Ending the Gerrymander Wars
The New York Times

The New York Times endorses Representative Tanner's redistricting bill.

May 24th 2005
Tanner bill would stop mid-decade remaps
Roll Call

Representative Tanner's bill would prevent mid-decade redistricting and help increase electoral competition.

April 19th 2005
Battle royal brewing over redistricting
The San Francisco Examiner

Instead of focusing on redistricting reforms, California should adopt a non-winner-take-all voting system to make elections more competitive.

April 10th 2005
National Guidelines Needed to Ensure Fair House Districts
San Jose Mercury News

FairVote's Rob Richie and John Anderson call for national redistricting standards to prevent the looming state-by-state

[ Previous ] [ Next ]