HB 836
Background and Procedural Information

On January 8, 2008 Virginia Democratic House Delegate Brian Moran introduced Virginia House Bill 836 (VA H.B. 836).  As of June 6, 2008 it was left in the Committee on Privileges and Elections.  This bill would create a five-member independent redistricting committee composed of retired judges who would be responsible for creating redistricting plans for the Virginia legislative and congressional districts.   

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

No.  Single-member districts are neither required nor implied.  

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

Yes.  VA H.B. 836 states, “All districts shall be drawn to comply with the Virginia and United States Constitutions, federal law, the federal Voting Rights Act as amended, and relevant case law.” The commission may not use data regarding election outcomes, voting history, voting trends or patterns, the residences of candidates for relevant offices, or the partisan affiliation of voters except to test for legal compliance.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court nominates twenty-four Virginia state and federal judges who have never held a partisan office.  The Speaker of the House of Delegates, the Minority Leader of the House of Delegates, the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate each select one of the nominees to serve as commissioners.  These four commissioners then select one of the remaining twenty nominees to serve as the chairman and final member of the commission.  The Commission will submit a plan to the legislature.  The legislature will make the final decision although the commission may comment on the proposed amendments or changes to the final district maps.
 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

Yes.  Competitive districts are considered one of the eight standards that the commission is instructed to use in creating the district maps.  However, competitive districts may not “be made artificially competitive in violation of other standards.”

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No.  Members of the public may attend and give comments at a minimum of five public hearings.  There is also a twelve-member citizens advisory board whose members may give advice to the commission at the commission’s request.  The same four legislative leaders who appointed the first four commissioners each appoint three members to serve on the advisory board.    

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No.  The Commission is dissolved after it presents its maps in years ending in one.

 
November 10th 2005
Why Redistricting and Campaign Reform Are Both Still Relevant
TPM Cafe

This political column cites FairVote as it points to the value of getting rid of winner-take-all elections to as the next step in redistricting reform.

November 2nd 2005
Gerrymander may help GOP in '06
The Napa Valley Registrer

An article that cites FairVote on why Gerrymandering harms elections and has an impact on skewed results.

November 2nd 2005
California, Ohio to vote on redistricting changes
Washington Post

FairVote's Rob Richie gets the last word on lack of voter choice in our elections, as this wire article reports on redistricting reform efforts in California and Ohio.

November 2nd 2005
How Money Buys Power in American Politics

Francis X. Clines, an editorial board member for the New York Times, writes on national politics, gerrymandering and the resultant decreased competitiveness in Congressional elections. Fairvote is cited.

October 27th 2005
To Tame Polarization Of Politics, Fix Our Redistricting System
Roll Call

[ Previous ] [ Next ]