SB 198
Background and Procedural Information

Colorado Senate Majority Leader Ken Gordon introduced Colorado Senate Bill 198 (CO S.B. 198) on March 6, 2008.  As of June 4, 2008 it has passed the Senate but has been indefinitely postponed in a House Committee.  This bill would establish new criteria for Colorado’s independent Reapportioning Commission to use when creating Congressional districts.

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

No.  There are no restrictions on the creation of multi-member districts.   

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

This bill proposes six ranked criteria be used to develop districts.  The criteria ranked second in importance states that a factor should be “non-dilution of minority voting strength.”  There is no overt mention of the Voting Rights Act.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The existing law of Colorado has the eleven person commission is formed by the legislative leaders of Colorado each choosing one commissioner, the governor choosing three commissioners, and four commissioners chosen by the Chief Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court.  A maximum of six commissioners may be members of the same political party.
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

The commission is to create districts based on six criteria ranked in order of importance.  The sixth criterion is that “to the extent practicable the General Assembly shall create districts that promote fair and equitable representation and electoral competition.”  

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No.  The existing law of Colorado does not allow for members of the public to submit their own plan.  

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

The existing law only provides for one redistricting session per decade.   
November 10th 2005
Why Redistricting and Campaign Reform Are Both Still Relevant
TPM Cafe

This political column cites FairVote as it points to the value of getting rid of winner-take-all elections to as the next step in redistricting reform.

November 2nd 2005
California, Ohio to vote on redistricting changes
Washington Post

FairVote's Rob Richie gets the last word on lack of voter choice in our elections, as this wire article reports on redistricting reform efforts in California and Ohio.

November 2nd 2005
How Money Buys Power in American Politics

Francis X. Clines, an editorial board member for the New York Times, writes on national politics, gerrymandering and the resultant decreased competitiveness in Congressional elections. Fairvote is cited.

November 2nd 2005
Gerrymander may help GOP in '06
The Napa Valley Registrer

An article that cites FairVote on why Gerrymandering harms elections and has an impact on skewed results.

October 27th 2005
To Tame Polarization Of Politics, Fix Our Redistricting System
Roll Call

[ Previous ] [ Next ]