HCR 5036

KS H.C.R. 5036, introduced in the 2006 session.

Background and procedural information:
A redistricting commission shall be established to recommend to the legislature redistricting plans for Kansas house of representatives districts, Kansas senate districts, state board of education districts and United States congress districts.

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?
No.

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?
Yes. The commission must consider protection of voting rights of racial, ethnic and language minority groups as required by law, and may not divide cities unless required to protect the voting rights of such groups. The bill also contains provisions prohibiting the use of political data, unless needed to comply with federal law.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?
The redistricting commission shall consist of five members who shall be retired judges of the Kansas court of appeals or retired justices of the Kansas Supreme Court. The president of the Kansas senate, the minority leader of the Kansas senate, the speaker of the Kansas House of Representatives and the minority leader of the Kansas House of Representatives shall appoint one member each. The commission creates the plans, the legislature votes on them.

Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?
Neutral; the redistricting commission shall consider the following, in descending order from highest to lowest priority: Equality of population as required by law; protection of voting rights of racial, ethnic and language minority groups as required by law; preservation of political subdivisions; contiguity and compactness of districts; and avoidance of placing more than one incumbent in a district.

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?
No.

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?
No.

 
August 29th 2005
Purple fingers in California
The Oakland Tribune

California call to arms against crooked gerrymandering

August 26th 2005
Time to end redistricting's rigged democracy

Editorial that discusses gerrymandering in California and argues for redistricting reform.

August 24th 2005
Defeating Pa. Incumbents Won't Be Easy
Chambersburg Public Opinion

FairVote is cited in this editorial that reveals how gerrymandering has stifled competitiveness of elections.

July 31st 2005
Redistricting Reform: Road Map to Nowhere?
Sacramento Bee

The Greenlining Institute's Paul Turner and the New America Foundation's Steven Hill discuss the limitations of redistricting reform, as well as ways of improving it, such as through proportional voting in multimember districts.

July 23rd 2005
Time to put an end to the gerrymander
San Antonio-Express News

Rep. John Tanner's Act is lauded as a solution to gerrymandering, specifically in Texas.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]