Senate Joint Resolution 9
Background and procedural information
Senate Joint Resolution 9, which would strike out the current Article 4 and create a new Article 17 to the Indiana constitution, was introduced on 1/11/05 by Senator Vi Simpson, a Democrat from Bloomington, and was referred to the committee on elections and civic affairs.


Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

No. While districts must have equal population, there is no requirement that they be single-member, and the bill does not state how many districts must be drawn.


Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?
Yes. While party registration and voting history data may not be used in drawing maps, that data may be used to test a map for compliance with federal law relating to voting rights.


Under the proposed legislation, what is the makeup of the commission and how is it formed?

The bill proposes a 5-member commission. The pool of potential candidates, who must apply by submitting an application to the Judicial Nominating Commission, would consist of 10 Democrats, 10 Republicans, and 5 nominees who are neither Democrats nor Republicans. The two house and senate leaders from each party would each appoint a member. The four appointed members must select the fifth member, who must be chosen from the group of candidates not affiliated with either the Democrats or the Republicans. This member also serves as the chair.


Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

Competitive districts are favored where practicable, and not in contravention of other stated goals of redistricting. However, the commission is not allowed to consider party registration and voting history data, so it is unclear how the commission would be able to draw a competitive district.


Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?
Possibly. While all meetings of the commission would be open to the public, there is neither an express prohibition nor allowance of public submittal of plans.


Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No. The commission is only allowed to meet in a year ending in one, unless it is otherwise directed by a court.

 
November 10th 2005
Why Redistricting and Campaign Reform Are Both Still Relevant
TPM Cafe

This political column cites FairVote as it points to the value of getting rid of winner-take-all elections to as the next step in redistricting reform.

November 2nd 2005
Gerrymander may help GOP in '06
The Napa Valley Registrer

An article that cites FairVote on why Gerrymandering harms elections and has an impact on skewed results.

November 2nd 2005
California, Ohio to vote on redistricting changes
Washington Post

FairVote's Rob Richie gets the last word on lack of voter choice in our elections, as this wire article reports on redistricting reform efforts in California and Ohio.

November 2nd 2005
How Money Buys Power in American Politics

Francis X. Clines, an editorial board member for the New York Times, writes on national politics, gerrymandering and the resultant decreased competitiveness in Congressional elections. Fairvote is cited.

October 27th 2005
To Tame Polarization Of Politics, Fix Our Redistricting System
Roll Call

[ Previous ] [ Next ]