Everyone's vote should be equal when electing the president, no matter where they live. FairVote is a leader in the campaign to establish a national popular vote for president, and recommends that political parties establish a schedule and rules to promote all states having a meaningful vote in nomination contests.


Rob Richie on All Things Considered
Tackling 'the slow motion stampede' on NPR
FairVote executive director Rob Richie spoke with Melissa Block on NPR’s "All Things Considered" to discuss solutions to the broken presidential primary system, along with Kentucky Secretary of State Tray Grayson. Rob focused on the FairVote-backed “American Plan,” a system that creates clusters of primaries of increasing state size.

You can listen to the broadcast here, and you can subscribe to FairVote’s podcast feed so you’ll always be the first to get FairVote’s audio and video offerings!

[ FixThePrimaries.com ]
[ More on the American Plan for Presidential Primaries ]
[ FairVote's Ryan O'Donnell op-ed in the Miami Herald ]


National Popular Vote on the Ballot in California?
Bill stands in contrast to effort to divide electoral votes by district
Papers were filed to place the National Popular Vote plan on the ballot in California in 2008. Under the plan, California would join an interstate compact to award its electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote in all fifty states. Nationally, the National Popular Vote legislation has 364 Sponsors in 47 States, including California, where the bill recently passed the State Senate.

A competing ballot initiative proposes to divide California's electoral votes by congressional district. FairVote's report "Fuzzy Math: Wrong Way Reforms for Allocating Electoral College Votes" explains the folly of awarding electoral votes by congressional district, even if done in every state in the country.

[ Los Angeles Times story ]
[ Article in Slate by Jamie Raskin ]
[ National Popular Vote ]
[ FairVote's Report "Fuzzy Math" ]


Fuzzy Math
436 mini-elections for president are worse than one
To combat the feeling many states have of being voiceless in presidential elections, some Republicans in California and Democrats in North Carolina want to see their states� electoral votes awarded by congressional district rather than by winner-take-all. That way, the Golden State�s GOP can presumably deliver a score of electoral votes to their party�s nominee, and Democrats of the Old North can give five for their team otherwise have none.

That�s fair, right? Not quite.

A new report by FairVote studies the flaws in alternative methods of allocating electoral votes.

[ Read the report ]
[ Read a Newsweek article on the California proposal ]
[ Hear a podcasted interview on our report ]


Bipartisan Vote in Illinois for NPV

The Illinois State Senate has joined the House in passing the National Popular Vote bill into law. The bill has now passed 11 legislative chambers across the country since it was first announced in February 2006.

Key to the bill's progress has been former FairVote general counsel Dan Johnson-Weinberger and enthusiastic bill sponsors such as Sen. Kirk W. Dillard (R) and Sen. Jacqueline Y. Collins (D).

Illinois, a classic spectator state, is the largest state to receive zero dollars spent in political advertising, and not a single campaign visit in 2004. In contrast, the National Popular Vote plan would make every vote equal and compel candidates to engage voters in every state.

[ More on NPV in Illinois ]
[ FairVote's report Presidential Inequality ]



[ Previous ] [ Next ]  


Fuzzy Math Report

Presidential Elections Inequality Report
August 10th 2009
Commentary: A cure for the political nomination process
Cleveland Plain Dealer

FairVote's Rob Richie and Paul Fidalgo offer a way to give everyone a say in presidential nominations while retaining the valuable state-by-state evaluation process. This piece also ran in McClatchy's newswire.

July 13th 2009
Albatross of U.S. democracy
Indianapolis Star

FairVote research is cited in support of the National Popular Vote plan in Indiana, because "every vote cast for president should be equally important and equally coveted, whether it originates in California, Connecticut or Crawfordsville."

July 9th 2009
Winner-take-all can elect a second-place president
San Diego Union-Tribune

The founder of National Popular Vote lays out the shortcomings and injustices of the Electoral College system, and shows why the National Popular Vote plan is the right solution.

May 17th 2009
Why states should adopt the National Popular Vote plan for president
San Diego Union-Tribune

FairVote's Rob Richie writes that the Electoral College deepens political inequality, and explains why the National Popular Vote plan is our best opportunity to ensure that every vote for president is equally valued.

May 14th 2009
Let's Make Every Vote Count
The Nation

Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of the Nation magazine, highlights FairVote's research in an important piece on the "broad support" growing in the states for the National Popular Vote plan to elect the president.