December 18th 2002
The case for runoffs
St. Petersburg Times

December 14th 2002
Let voters express will through instant runoffs
Palm Beach Post

November 29th 2002
Election Day replay poses avoidable problems
USA Today

Instant runoff voting (IRV) is posed as an alternative to costly runoffs in Louisianna, that still ensures candidates will have to get a majority of the vote to win.

November 12th 2002
Instant runoff: It's a better way to vote
Minneapolis Star-Tribune

Minnesota's third-parties are strongly promoting the voting method of instant runoff voting (IRV) to provide voters with more options and force candidates to receive the majority of votes in an election.

August 25th 2002
Instant runoff voting pros outweigh cons
Juneau Empire

Alaska may be the first state to introduce instant runoff voting (IRV) in their elections on August 27, 2002.

July 19th 2002
Galling Garst
Minneapolis Star-Tribune

This Minnesota newspaper supports the adoption of instant runoff voting (IRV) so that third party supporters can vote their conscience.

June 5th 2002
Instant runoff: Alaska voters to decide change in electoral system
Anchorage Daily News

Alaska places instant runoff voting on its ballot as an initiative. It would affect statewide offices, but not those of governor and lieutenant governor.

May 8th 2002
Advocate drops drive for 'instant runoff' initiative
Missoulian

Matthew Singer's proposal of instant runoff voting (IRV) for elections in Montana has been withdrawn to reduce the overabundance of ballot issues.

March 25th 2002
Majority Would Really Rule
South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Fairvote's John Anderson comments on the benefits of adopting instant runoff voting measures.

March 13th 2002
Democratic Runoff
Burlington Free Press

March 12th 2002
A better voting system
Trenton Times

After being adopted in San Francisco and despite technical obstacles, instant runoff voting (IRV) is recommened for New Jersey.

March 10th 2002
Instant solution
Rutland Herald

[ Previous ] [ Next ]