ERS Jubilant at Richard Commission Backing for STV
Published March 31st 2004 in Electoral Reform Society Press ReleaseThe Electoral Reform Society has warmly welcomed the
announcement today by the Richard Commission in favor of electing the National
Assembly for Wales by the single transferable vote (STV).
"We are delighted that the Richard Commission has recommended STV,"
said Ken Ritchie, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society. "We hope
that this recommendation will receive the backing of the Assembly and lead to
change being implemented by Westminster."
"STV is the fairest system because it combines party proportionality with
much enhanced voter choice. It is the best for both voters and parties."
"Although the current voting system ensures that parties have broadly the
share of seats in the Assembly that their electoral support warrants as the
Commission has rightly noted, it creates two types of elected
representative and there can be conflict between the two. There is also a lack
of choice for voters who must take the candidates that their favored party
gives them in the order determined by the party. Under STV, electors can choose
between candidates of the same party."
"The current system also allows anomalies such as the West question
where the three losers in a constituency contest were nevertheless returned to
the Assembly from the list. STV has no lists and so solves this problem."
"There will, of course, be some debate about the number of members to be
elected from each constituency. The more seats in each constituency, the more
proportional the system. But it is very good news that the principles of STV
have been accepted."
"STV was also the recommendation of the Sunderland Commission which looked
at the best way of electing local government in Wales. Although that
recommendation has been shelved, we believe that Lord Richard's findings deserve
support."
ERS Jubilant at Richard Commission Backing for STV
Published March 31st 2004 in Electoral Reform Society Press ReleaseThe Electoral Reform Society has warmly welcomed the
announcement today by the Richard Commission in favor of electing the National
Assembly for Wales by the single transferable vote (STV).
"We are delighted that the Richard Commission has recommended STV,"
said Ken Ritchie, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society. "We hope
that this recommendation will receive the backing of the Assembly and lead to
change being implemented by Westminster."
"STV is the fairest system because it combines party proportionality with
much enhanced voter choice. It is the best for both voters and parties."
"Although the current voting system ensures that parties have broadly the
share of seats in the Assembly that their electoral support warrants as the
Commission has rightly noted, it creates two types of elected
representative and there can be conflict between the two. There is also a lack
of choice for voters who must take the candidates that their favored party
gives them in the order determined by the party. Under STV, electors can choose
between candidates of the same party."
"The current system also allows anomalies such as the West question
where the three losers in a constituency contest were nevertheless returned to
the Assembly from the list. STV has no lists and so solves this problem."
"There will, of course, be some debate about the number of members to be
elected from each constituency. The more seats in each constituency, the more
proportional the system. But it is very good news that the principles of STV
have been accepted."
"STV was also the recommendation of the Sunderland Commission which looked
at the best way of electing local government in Wales. Although that
recommendation has been shelved, we believe that Lord Richard's findings deserve
support."
ERS Jubilant at Richard Commission Backing for STV
Published March 31st 2004 in Electoral Reform Society Press ReleaseThe Electoral Reform Society has warmly welcomed the
announcement today by the Richard Commission in favor of electing the National
Assembly for Wales by the single transferable vote (STV).
"We are delighted that the Richard Commission has recommended STV,"
said Ken Ritchie, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society. "We hope
that this recommendation will receive the backing of the Assembly and lead to
change being implemented by Westminster."
"STV is the fairest system because it combines party proportionality with
much enhanced voter choice. It is the best for both voters and parties."
"Although the current voting system ensures that parties have broadly the
share of seats in the Assembly that their electoral support warrants as the
Commission has rightly noted, it creates two types of elected
representative and there can be conflict between the two. There is also a lack
of choice for voters who must take the candidates that their favored party
gives them in the order determined by the party. Under STV, electors can choose
between candidates of the same party."
"The current system also allows anomalies such as the West question
where the three losers in a constituency contest were nevertheless returned to
the Assembly from the list. STV has no lists and so solves this problem."
"There will, of course, be some debate about the number of members to be
elected from each constituency. The more seats in each constituency, the more
proportional the system. But it is very good news that the principles of STV
have been accepted."
"STV was also the recommendation of the Sunderland Commission which looked
at the best way of electing local government in Wales. Although that
recommendation has been shelved, we believe that Lord Richard's findings deserve
support."
ERS Jubilant at Richard Commission Backing for STV
Published March 31st 2004 in Electoral Reform Society Press ReleaseThe Electoral Reform Society has warmly welcomed the
announcement today by the Richard Commission in favor of electing the National
Assembly for Wales by the single transferable vote (STV).
"We are delighted that the Richard Commission has recommended STV,"
said Ken Ritchie, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society. "We hope
that this recommendation will receive the backing of the Assembly and lead to
change being implemented by Westminster."
"STV is the fairest system because it combines party proportionality with
much enhanced voter choice. It is the best for both voters and parties."
"Although the current voting system ensures that parties have broadly the
share of seats in the Assembly that their electoral support warrants as the
Commission has rightly noted, it creates two types of elected
representative and there can be conflict between the two. There is also a lack
of choice for voters who must take the candidates that their favored party
gives them in the order determined by the party. Under STV, electors can choose
between candidates of the same party."
"The current system also allows anomalies such as the West question
where the three losers in a constituency contest were nevertheless returned to
the Assembly from the list. STV has no lists and so solves this problem."
"There will, of course, be some debate about the number of members to be
elected from each constituency. The more seats in each constituency, the more
proportional the system. But it is very good news that the principles of STV
have been accepted."
"STV was also the recommendation of the Sunderland Commission which looked
at the best way of electing local government in Wales. Although that
recommendation has been shelved, we believe that Lord Richard's findings deserve
support."
ERS Jubilant at Richard Commission Backing for STV
Published March 31st 2004 in Electoral Reform Society Press ReleaseThe Electoral Reform Society has warmly welcomed the
announcement today by the Richard Commission in favor of electing the National
Assembly for Wales by the single transferable vote (STV).
"We are delighted that the Richard Commission has recommended STV,"
said Ken Ritchie, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society. "We hope
that this recommendation will receive the backing of the Assembly and lead to
change being implemented by Westminster."
"STV is the fairest system because it combines party proportionality with
much enhanced voter choice. It is the best for both voters and parties."
"Although the current voting system ensures that parties have broadly the
share of seats in the Assembly that their electoral support warrants as the
Commission has rightly noted, it creates two types of elected
representative and there can be conflict between the two. There is also a lack
of choice for voters who must take the candidates that their favored party
gives them in the order determined by the party. Under STV, electors can choose
between candidates of the same party."
"The current system also allows anomalies such as the West question
where the three losers in a constituency contest were nevertheless returned to
the Assembly from the list. STV has no lists and so solves this problem."
"There will, of course, be some debate about the number of members to be
elected from each constituency. The more seats in each constituency, the more
proportional the system. But it is very good news that the principles of STV
have been accepted."
"STV was also the recommendation of the Sunderland Commission which looked
at the best way of electing local government in Wales. Although that
recommendation has been shelved, we believe that Lord Richard's findings deserve
support."