FairVote California
270 Alvarado Rd.
Berkeley, CA 94705

650-544-5925
Board Members
Pete Martineau

David Wilner

Rob Dickinson

Click here for bios.



California Reform Initiative

Best Methods for Representing California

State Legislatures Encourage Civic Participation
States introduce bills to increase youth voting
VotedA number of state legislatures have introduced bills that aim to increase youth voter participation. Proposals have included lowering the voting age, allowing 17-year-olds to vote in primary elections and advance registration for 16-year-olds. Minnesota introduced a constitutional amendment lowering the voting age from 18 to 16. In Connecticut, the legislature is considering two bills (HJ 7, HJ 11) that would allow 17-year-olds to vote in primary elections if they will be 18 before the general election. Three states--California, Maryland and Pennsylvania--want to promote youth voter participation through advance registration and by establishing "high school voter weeks" twice a year. Strengthening civic education in high schools was considered (but did not make it through committee) in Florida and Indiana, but a FairVote-backed civic education bill in Maryland was signed into law.

Read more about FairVote's 100% Youth Voter Registration Project
Read about FairVote's high school voting curriculum, Learning Democracy


One-Two Punch Lands Squarely on Winner Take All Presidential Elections
North Carolina and California Senates Pass National Popular Vote

In an exciting electoral double-whammy, the National Popular Vote bill passed the State Senate in both North Carolina and California on May 14, 2007.

California's SB 37 was approved by the Senate Committee on Elections, Redistricting, and Constitutional Amendments on March 21, 2007, and passed on final reading by a vote of 22-14. North Carolina's SB 954 passed by a vote of 30-18. Eyes now turn to the House in both states.

In little over a year since its kick-off, the NPV bill has demonstrated some fancy footwork, passing a total of 10 legislative chambers. The number of legislative supporters has also continued to grow, recently surpassing 350 sponsors in 47 States.

[ AP Story on North Carolina ]
[ Charlotte Observer story ]
[ More on National Popular Vote ]
[ NPV in the Harvard Journal on Legislation (.pdf) ] NEW!



Big Week for IRV
Three Legislative Advances and an Important Endorsement
Committee Hearing The week of May 7th, 2007, was a big week for IRV across the country. The Illinois Senate approved legislation that would adopt ranked ballots for military and overseas voters. The Vermont House Government Operations Committee approved a bill, already approved by the Senate, to adopt IRV for U.S. Senate and House races in Vermont. In California, the Assembly Appropriations Committee approved legislation that would give local governments the option of using IRV.

In other exciting news, former Illinois congressman John Porter of the Brookings Institution's Opportunity '08 project released a position paper promoting IRV as a means to encourage voter participation.

[ Opportunity '08 election reform factsheet ]
[ Opportunity '08 position paper by John Porter ]
[ Coverage of the Illinois legislation ]
[ Op-Ed from the Vermont League of Women Voters president ]



[ Previous ] [ Next ]  
April 1st 2009
Runaway, Budget-Busting Runoffs
California Progress Report

California State Assemblymember Ted Lieu and New America Foundation Political Reform Program Deputy Director Gautam Dutta explain why instant runoff voting would be preferable to California's current runoff system.

March 31st 2009
L.A. County to study using instant runoff elections
Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles County will look at using instant runoff voting in county elections in order to avoid the numerous runoffs the city holds each year.

March 31st 2009
Mark Ridley-Thomas calls for 'instant runoff' system
Los Angeles Daily News

Los Angeles County Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas introduced a measure calling for instant runoff voting for county elections.

March 10th 2009
Let's start instant runoffs and cut our election costs
Los Angeles Daily News

Los Angeles City Councilman Jos� Huizar proposes instant runoff voting as the solution to the city's problems with runoff costs and voter fatigue.

March 7th 2009
Opinion: A cheaper, quicker, more civil way to run San Jose elections: instant runoffs
San Jose Mercury News

New America Foundation Political Reform Program Deputy Director Blair Bobier advocates for instant runoff voting as a way to cut the cost of elections in San Jose in half, as IRV would only require one election.

February 26th 2009
Five ways to fix City Hall
Sacramento News & Review

Article on ideas to reform Sacramento City Council and Mayoral offices where City Councilwoman Lauren Hammond advocates for instant runoff voting.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]