Interregional Primary Plan by Congressman Sandy Levin
The Interregional Primary Plan breaks the country up into 6 geographical regions. The primary schedule spreads across several months with a primary date on various Tuesdays between March and June. On each primary date, at least one state from each regions votes, such that varying views across America are represented on each election date. The country is also split into six sub-regions that vote together. The initial order of sub-regions is determined by a lottery that creates a rotating cycle for subsequent elections. In a 24-year cycle, every sub-region will have had an opportunity to lead off the primary schedule.

Levin’s plan would break down the country into six regions, with six-sub regions. The schedule is as follows:

-- Second Tuesday in March
-- First Tuesday in April
-- Fourth Tuesday in April
-- Second Tuesday in May
-- Fourth Tuesday in May
-- Second Tuesday in June

The regions and sub-regions would be broken down in the following:

Region 1: (A) Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont; (B) Massachusetts; (C) Connecticut, Rhode Island; (D) Delaware, New Jersey; (E) New York; (F) Pennsylvania

Region 2: (A) Maryland; (B) West Virginia; (C) Missouri; (D) Indiana; (E) Kentucky; (F) Tennessee

Region 3: (A) Ohio; (B) Illinois; (C) Michigan; (D) Wisconsin; (E) Iowa; (F) Minnesota

Region 4: (A) Texas; (B) Louisiana; (C) Arkansas, Oklahoma; (D) Colorado; (E) Kansas, Nebraska; (F) Arizona, New Mexico

Region 5: (A) Virginia; (B) North Carolina; (C) South Carolina; (D) Florida; (E) Georgia; (F) Mississippi, Alabama

Region 6: (A) California; (B) Washington; (C) Oregon; (D) Idaho, Nevada, Utah; (E) Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming; (F) Hawaii, Alaska

Source: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/mi12_levin/pr031407.html  
July 18th 2005
Richardson bets chips on a Western strategy
The Hill

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is pushing to increase the weight of Western states with fast-growing Hispanic populations in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary.

July 12th 2005
The Iowa Stranglehold
TomPaine.com

Kerry campaign staff member explains the need to reform the presidential nomination process.

July 4th 2005
New date of primary a worry to reformers
Newark Star Ledger

FairVote and other election reform organizations point out "race to the front" won't solve presidential nomination woes.

June 24th 2005
Senate votes to move up primary
Star Ledger

New Jersey votes for earlier presidential primary, intending to increase its influence.

May 1st 2005
10 Steps to Better Elections
Sierra Club

FairVote senior analyst's ten-point fair elections plan includes full representation, instant runoff voting, direct presidential election, Right to Vote Amendment, and other needed voting improvements

March 26th 2005
Election reform: Carter, Baker tackle it
Minneapolis Star Tribune

Minnesota newspaper encourages new Carter/Baker commission to review IRV, Electoral College, and national standards

January 26th 2005
Instant runoff would end spoiler effect in elections
San Jose Mercury News

IRV's success in San Francisco demonstrates its potential to create fairer elections on a national scale.

December 15th 2004
Several Factors Contributed to Long Lines on Election Day
The Washington Post

December 13th 2004
The Election Ran Smoothly, Didn't It?
www.tompaine.com

Jesse L. Jackson, Jr., D-IL, argues that the lesson of 2004 is that our right to vote is not secure. We need a federal right to vote with standards and the enforcement of those standards by the attorney general of the United States, rather than the p

[ Previous ] [ Next ]