Resolution Supporting California�s Impact on the Democratic Presidential Nomination Process

California Young Democrats Logo

WHEREAS California’s impact in determining the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party for the last several elections has decreased, and

WHEREAS the current front-loaded primary system often results in fewer than 200,000 Iowans and 300,000 New Hampshire voters in the first weeks of January in effect choosing the Party’s nominee before being tested in larger states like California, and

WHEREAS California, as the highest populated state in the nation, deserves greater influence in determining the party’s nominee than simply serving as the fundraising capital for national candidates and their campaigns,

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the California Young Democrats (CYD) encourages presidential primary reform efforts that will:

· Allow a greater number of campaigns to begin at the grassroots level and build momentum;

· Provide a nominating process that remains competitive for a longer period of time in order to give the public a greater opportunity to engage the campaign and become informed about the candidates;

· And create a system that increases the likelihood that Democrats in all states will have an  effective voice in the selection of nominees, and

RESOLVED that CYD call on the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) Commission on Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling to seriously consider the California (or Graduated Random System) Plan which features a schedule consisting of 10 two-week intervals, during which randomly selected states will hold their primaries.  This 20-week schedule is the approximate length of the traditional presidential primary schedule, and

RESOLVED that CYD distribute copies of this resolution to all CYD chartered clubs, the California Democratic Party and the DNC for consideration and support.

Drafted by David Phelps, Past President, San Fernando Valley Young Democrats

 
July 18th 2005
Richardson bets chips on a Western strategy
The Hill

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is pushing to increase the weight of Western states with fast-growing Hispanic populations in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary.

July 12th 2005
The Iowa Stranglehold
TomPaine.com

Kerry campaign staff member explains the need to reform the presidential nomination process.

July 4th 2005
New date of primary a worry to reformers
Newark Star Ledger

FairVote and other election reform organizations point out "race to the front" won't solve presidential nomination woes.

June 24th 2005
Senate votes to move up primary
Star Ledger

New Jersey votes for earlier presidential primary, intending to increase its influence.

May 1st 2005
10 Steps to Better Elections
Sierra Club

FairVote senior analyst's ten-point fair elections plan includes full representation, instant runoff voting, direct presidential election, Right to Vote Amendment, and other needed voting improvements

March 26th 2005
Election reform: Carter, Baker tackle it
Minneapolis Star Tribune

Minnesota newspaper encourages new Carter/Baker commission to review IRV, Electoral College, and national standards

January 26th 2005
Instant runoff would end spoiler effect in elections
San Jose Mercury News

IRV's success in San Francisco demonstrates its potential to create fairer elections on a national scale.

December 15th 2004
Several Factors Contributed to Long Lines on Election Day
The Washington Post

December 13th 2004
The Election Ran Smoothly, Didn't It?
www.tompaine.com

Jesse L. Jackson, Jr., D-IL, argues that the lesson of 2004 is that our right to vote is not secure. We need a federal right to vote with standards and the enforcement of those standards by the attorney general of the United States, rather than the p

[ Previous ] [ Next ]