HCA 44
Background and Procedural Information

Democratic Representative James Brosnahan introduced Illinois House Constitutional Amendment 44 (IL
On April 10, 2008 Illinois Demo H.C.A. 44).  As of June 5, 2008 it has not been introduced to a committee.  This amendment would have the effect of no longer requiring two House districts be entirely contained within one Senate district.  It also places the responsibility for the Illinois Senate and House entirely within each body instead of the legislature as a whole.  The method of choosing Congressional districts remains unchanged.    

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

Single-member districts are a requirement.   

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

There are no restrictions on the Commission or Legislature from using voter history information.  Minority voting districts are encouraged.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The Illinois Senate and House each have responsibility for their own redistricting plan until June 30.  A plan must receive a three-fifths majority vote.  Only the Senate can create a redistricting map for the Senate and only the House can create a redistricting map for the House.  Each body only votes for its own plan.  If a plan is not approved in the Senate the President and Minority Leader must appoint two people to serve on a Legislative District Redistricting Commission.  The House uses a similar plan except that the Speaker of the House and the House Minority Leader appoints the first four commission members to serve on a Representative District Redistricting Commission.  These four people will elect a fifth member who does not belong to either of the state’s largest political parties who will serve as chairman.  This Commission can approve a Senate redistricting plan with the approval of three of the Commissions five members.  If the Commission cannot reach an agreement by July 1 then the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and another Supreme Court Justice selected by the Supreme Court, but from a different party than the Chief Justice will choose one person to act as a Special Master.  The Special Master will then create a final redistricting map.  
 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

No.  There is no provision to foster competitive districts.  

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No.  The District Redistricting Commissions “may hold public hearing and collect information,” but it is not required to do so.  

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No.  There is no provision for mid-decade redistricting.

 
June 18th 2006
Where politicians dare to tread
San Francisco Chronicle

The San Francisco Chronicle editorial board endorses the British Columbia Citizens Assembly approach to electoral reform, specifically noting the potential for proportional representation in California.

March 21st 2006
Real redistricting reform is proportional representation
San Francisco Examiner

Rob Dickinson of Californians for Electoral Reform writes a commentary on how recent proposals to make the redistricting process fairer miss the mark. For real progress in how we elect our representatives, we need to turn to proportional voting.

March 1st 2006
Tanner redistricting bill gains Senate sponsor
The Hill

Senator Tim Johnson introduced a companion bill to Rep. John Tanner's federal redistricting reform legislation. The identical bills, supported by FairVote, would set up state commissions to handle redistricting only once a decade.

December 20th 2005
Overhaul of state electoral system sought

Following on the heels of the defeat of redistricting reform in California, Republican and Democratic legislators plan on introducing legislation to create a citizens assembly for election reform and discuss proportional voting for the state.

December 11th 2005
A Dramatic Idea for Election Reform
New York Times

A Times reader highlights the fundamental weakness of any single-member district-based system: gerrymandering is unavoidable.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]