HB 741

HB 741

Background and procedural information:
Providing a process for establishing districts for the election of members of Congress; establishing criteria for creating districts; directing the Department of Legislative Services to hold public hearings and develop up to three congressional districting plans; establishing a temporary Redistricting Advisory Commission and specifying members' qualifications and the duties of the Commission; directing the General Assembly to act on the plan or plans within specified times; etc.

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?
No.

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?
Yes. No districts may be drawn for the purpose of diluting minority voting strength, but no use may be made of political affiliation, registration, polling data, etc. to achieve that purpose.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?
9 members, 4 appointed by the governor, 2 by the president of the senate, 2 by speaker of the house; at least 3 must be of the minority party. These members then elect a chair. Members may not have been a member of the general assembly, congress, a candidate for either, an appointed official, campaign manager, or lobbyist. Members must also reflect the geographic, gender and racial or ethnic diversity of the state.

Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?
Neutral.

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?
Members of the public are encouraged to give input at a series of public meetings and critique the proposed plans, however nowhere does the bill state that a member of the public may produce his own plan.

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?
No.

 
June 18th 2006
Where politicians dare to tread
San Francisco Chronicle

The San Francisco Chronicle editorial board endorses the British Columbia Citizens Assembly approach to electoral reform, specifically noting the potential for proportional representation in California.

March 21st 2006
Real redistricting reform is proportional representation
San Francisco Examiner

Rob Dickinson of Californians for Electoral Reform writes a commentary on how recent proposals to make the redistricting process fairer miss the mark. For real progress in how we elect our representatives, we need to turn to proportional voting.

March 1st 2006
Tanner redistricting bill gains Senate sponsor
The Hill

Senator Tim Johnson introduced a companion bill to Rep. John Tanner's federal redistricting reform legislation. The identical bills, supported by FairVote, would set up state commissions to handle redistricting only once a decade.

December 20th 2005
Overhaul of state electoral system sought

Following on the heels of the defeat of redistricting reform in California, Republican and Democratic legislators plan on introducing legislation to create a citizens assembly for election reform and discuss proportional voting for the state.

December 11th 2005
A Dramatic Idea for Election Reform
New York Times

A Times reader highlights the fundamental weakness of any single-member district-based system: gerrymandering is unavoidable.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]