This table shows the result of the Chamber of Deputies elections on July 6, 2003, in terms of votes and seats won by each party. 
First, it shows the votes and seats won by parties in the party list elections.
Second, it shows the votes and seats won by parties in the single member district elections.
Third, it shows the total seats won by each party.
Last, it compares the seats won by each party to their share of the list vote.

Parties	PAN	PRI	PRI & PVEM	PRD	PT	PVEM	Convergencia	PSN	PAS	Mexico Posible	PLM	FC	unregistered candidates	null	Total
list votes	8,303,417	6,258,270	3,650,721	4,747,376	645,045	1,081,750	608,581	72,752	199,290	244,504	109,404	124,766	16,540	905,955	26,968,371
% list votes	30.79%	23.21%	13.54%	17.60%	2.39%	4.01%	2.26%	0.27%	0.74%	0.91%	0.41%	0.46%	0.06%	3.36%	100.00%
list seats	70		62	40	6	17	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	200
% list seats	35.00%		31.00%	20.00%	3.00%	8.50%	2.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	100.00%
Parties	PAN	PRI	PRI & PVEM	PRD	PT	PVEM	Convergencia	PSN	PAS	Mexico Posible	PLM	FC	unregistered candidates	null	Total
district votes	8,273,012	6,228,066	3,650,721	4,734,612	643,473	1,076,728	605,811	72,511	198,692	243,419	108,937	124,240	16,452	903,361	26,880,035
% district votes	30.78%	23.17%	13.58%	17.61%	2.39%	4.01%	2.25%	0.27%	0.74%	0.91%	0.41%	0.46%	0.06%	3.36%	100.00%
district seats	83	117	45	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	300
% district seats	27.67%	39.00%	15.00%	18.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	100.00%
Parties	PAN		PRI & PVEM	PRD	PT	PVEM	Convergencia	PSN	PAS	Mexico Posible	PLM	FC	unregistered candidates	null	Total
total seats	153		224	95	6	17	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	500
% total seats	30.60%		44.80%	19.00%	1.20%	3.40%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	100.00%
Parties	PAN		PRI & PVEM	PRD	PT	PVEM	Convergencia	PSN	PAS	Mexico Posible	PLM	FC	unregistered candidates	null	Total
% list votes	30.79%		36.74%	17.60%	2.39%	4.01%	2.26%	0.27%	0.74%	0.91%	0.41%	0.46%	0.06%	3.36%	100.00%
% total seats	30.60%		44.80%	19.00%	1.20%	3.40%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	100.00%
difference	-0.19%		8.06%	1.40%	-1.19%	-0.61%	-1.26%	-0.27%	-0.74%	-0.91%	-0.41%	-0.46%	-0.06%	-3.36%	0.00%

 

Sources:
[http://www.ife.org.mx] Instituto Federal Electoral
[http://www.ife.org.mx/computos2003/centrales/MR.html] Instituto Federal Electoral: "Eleccion de Diputados Federales por el principo de mayoria relativa."
[http://www.ife.org.mx/computos2003/centrales/NacionalCirc.html] Instituto Federal Electoral: "Elecci��n de Diputados Federales de representaci��n proporcional."
[http://prep.ife.org.mx:8080/elecciones2003nacional/index.html] Instituto Federal Electoral: "Elecciones Federales 2003."
[http://electionworld.org/mexico.htm] Electionworld.org: Mexico  

October 19th 2009
A better election system
Lowell Sun

Election expert Doug Amy explains how choice voting can "inject new blood" into the elections of Lowell (MA), and give voters a greater incentive to participate.

October 16th 2009
Haven't Detroit voters spoken enough?
Livingston Daily

In Detroit, there have been three mayors in the past two years and the current one has come under scrutiny. Perhaps a system like instant runoff voting will help bring political stability to motor city.

August 21st 2009
Black candidate for Euclid school board to test new voting system
Cleveland Plain Dealer

Limited voting, a form of proportional voting, will be used in Euclid (OH), in the hopes of allowing better representation of minorities.

July 2nd 2009
Reforming Albany
New York Times

FairVote's Rob Richie responds in a letter to the editor making the case for proportional voting systems to bring substantive reform to New York's legislature.