Indiana
House Districts: 9
Voting Age Population 2002: 4,579,000 2000: 4,448,000
1998: 4,410,000
1990: 4,088,195
Redistricting, 2001-2002 Divided (D-Influence) |
Presidential Vote 2000: Gore 41, Bush
57, Nader
1
1996: Clinton 42, Dole 47,
Perot
11
1992: Clinton 37, Bush 43,
Perot
20 U.S. House: 6 GOP, 3
Dem Seat Changes '02: 1 (-1D) Facts in Focus:
Indiana 1982 to
2002 |
How
Indiana Ranked in 2002 |
Democracy Index:
28th
Margin of Victory: 7th Landslide
Index: 10th |
Seats-to-Votes Distortion: 21st Representation Index: 44th Voter Participation:
37th |
For
definitions of terms, please see this report's glossary page. |
|
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
Democracy Index |
25.2 |
�� |
|
|
|
Voter Turnout |
33.2% |
|
|
|
|
Representation Index |
19.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasted Votes |
40.0% |
|
|
|
|
% of Wasted R / D Votes |
23.0 / 58.7 |
|
|
|
|
Drop-Off Voters |
-3.0% |
|
|
|
|
Avg. Margin Of Victory |
22.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes for (R�D�O%) |
55-42-3 |
|
|
|
|
Seats for (R�D�O%) |
67-33-0 |
|
|
|
|
Seat Changes |
1
(-1D) |
|
|
|
|
High % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1994 |
1996 |
1998 |
2000 |
Democracy Index |
�� |
�� |
21.2 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
Voter Turnout |
54% |
36% |
48% |
36% |
48.4% |
Representation Index |
33.4% |
21.3% |
28.9% |
22.1% |
29.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasted Votes |
38% |
41% |
39% |
38% |
39.9% |
% of Wasted R / D Votes |
57 / 22 |
28 / 56 |
28 / 50 |
27 / 50 |
41.5 / 50.2 |
Drop-Off Voters |
3.8% |
0% |
2.5% |
.8% |
1.9% |
Avg. Margin Of Victory |
23% |
18% |
23% |
26% |
22.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes for (R�D�O%) |
45�54�1 |
57�43�.2 |
53�45�2 |
55�43�3 |
52.8�44.1�2.9 |
Seats for (R�D�O%) |
30�70�0 |
60�40�0 |
60�40�0 |
60�40�0 |
60�40�0 |
Seat Changes |
�� |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
High % Turnout, District |
�� |
44 (6) |
63 (6) |
46 (6) |
71.4 (6) |
Low % Turnout, District |
�� |
27 (10) |
40 (10) |
29 (10) |
38.7 (10) |
|
Results 2002-2010 |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
U.S. House
(R�D) |
6-3 |
|
|
|
|
Landslide
Index |
55.6% |
|
|
|
|
Scale of Competitiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
Tight: <
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Competitive:
5-10 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Comfortable:
10-20 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Landslide:
20-40 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
No Contest:
40+ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Uncontested |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Incumbents |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Running
/ Total Seats |
8 / 9 |
|
|
|
|
Re-Election /
Total Incumbent |
8 / 8 |
|
|
|
|
Landslide /
Total Incumbent |
5 / 8 |
|
|
|
|
R. Landslide /
R. Incumbent |
4 / 5 |
|
|
|
|
D. Landslide /
D. Incumbent |
1 / 3 |
|
|
|
|
Untouchable
Repeat Landslide |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Uncontested
Primary |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Elected Women |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Elected Minorities |
1B |
|
|
|
|
|